Fixed Effects and Random Effects in Meta-Analysis
Ding‐Geng Chen, Karl E. Peace
Abstract
Ding‐Geng Chen, Karl E. Peace
Abstract
This chapter introduces fixed-effects and random-effects models used in meta-analysis where fixed-effects is the weighted mean method and random effects is the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model implemented in R libraries rmeta, meta, and metafor. When meta-analyzing effect sizes from different studies (such as separate clinical trials), the fundamental assumption in the fixed-effects model that the true effect size is the same for all studies may be impractical. Therefore, the random-effects meta-analysis model can incorporate both within-study and between-study variability which may be an important source of heterogeneity for meta-analysis. In practice, many analysts perform both a fixed-effects and a random-effects meta-analysis of the same set of studies – even if there is an “a priori” basis for believing the fixed-effects model is appropriate. The chapter discusses meta-analysis methods for synthesizing studies using publicly available data sets with both fixed-effects and random-effects models.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter introduces fixed-effects and random-effects models used in meta-analysis where fixed-effects is the weighted mean method and random effects is the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model implemented in R libraries rmeta, meta, and metafor. When meta-analyzing effect sizes from different studies (such as separate clinical trials), the fundamental assumption in the fixed-effects model that the true effect size is the same for all studies may be impractical. Therefore, the random-effects meta-analysis model can incorporate both within-study and between-study variability which may be an important source of heterogeneity for meta-analysis. In practice, many analysts perform both a fixed-effects and a random-effects meta-analysis of the same set of studies – even if there is an “a priori” basis for believing the fixed-effects model is appropriate. The chapter discusses meta-analysis methods for synthesizing studies using publicly available data sets with both fixed-effects and random-effects models.
Key concepts: Fixed effects model, Random effects model, Meta-analysis, Mathematics, Statistics, Medicine, Internal medicine, Panel data