2021Unpublished venueRequires access

Fixed Effects and Random Effects in Meta-Analysis

Ding‐Geng Chen, Karl E. Peace

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter introduces fixed-effects and random-effects models used in meta-analysis where fixed-effects is the weighted mean method and random effects is the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model implemented in R libraries rmeta, meta, and metafor. When meta-analyzing effect sizes from different studies (such as separate clinical trials), the fundamental assumption in the fixed-effects model that the true effect size is the same for all studies may be impractical. Therefore, the random-effects meta-analysis model can incorporate both within-study and between-study variability which may be an important source of heterogeneity for meta-analysis. In practice, many analysts perform both a fixed-effects and a random-effects meta-analysis of the same set of studies – even if there is an “a priori” basis for believing the fixed-effects model is appropriate. The chapter discusses meta-analysis methods for synthesizing studies using publicly available data sets with both fixed-effects and random-effects models.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter introduces fixed-effects and random-effects models used in meta-analysis where fixed-effects is the weighted mean method and random effects is the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model implemented in R libraries rmeta, meta, and metafor. When meta-analyzing effect sizes from different studies (such as separate clinical trials), the fundamental assumption in the fixed-effects model that the true effect size is the same for all studies may be impractical. Therefore, the random-effects meta-analysis model can incorporate both within-study and between-study variability which may be an important source of heterogeneity for meta-analysis. In practice, many analysts perform both a fixed-effects and a random-effects meta-analysis of the same set of studies – even if there is an “a priori” basis for believing the fixed-effects model is appropriate. The chapter discusses meta-analysis methods for synthesizing studies using publicly available data sets with both fixed-effects and random-effects models.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter introduces fixed-effects and random-effects models used in meta-analysis where fixed-effects is the weighted mean method and random effects is the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model implemented in R libraries rmeta, meta, and metafor. When meta-analyzing effect sizes from different studies (such as separate clinical trials), the fundamental assumption in the fixed-effects model that the true effect size is the same for all studies may be impractical. Therefore, the random-effects meta-analysis model can incorporate both within-study and between-study variability which may be an important source of heterogeneity for meta-analysis. In practice, many analysts perform both a fixed-effects and a random-effects meta-analysis of the same set of studies – even if there is an “a priori” basis for believing the fixed-effects model is appropriate. The chapter discusses meta-analysis methods for synthesizing studies using publicly available data sets with both fixed-effects and random-effects models.

Key concepts: Fixed effects model, Random effects model, Meta-analysis, Mathematics, Statistics, Medicine, Internal medicine, Panel data

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fixed Effects and Random Effects in Meta-Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens