The EU's development policy
Mark Langan, Sophia Price
Abstract
Mark Langan, Sophia Price
Abstract
The European Union&s;s development policy has historically focused upon former colonies, especially those within the African, Caribbean, and Pacific (ACP) group. This chapter explores EU development policy and discourse in terms of the legitimisation of asymmetric economic relations with ACP countries. It then examines the historical foundations of Europe&s;s development discourse and how it has moralised external interventions in former colonies. The chapter thereafter explores the continued relevance of the concept of &s;dependency&s; in terms of contemporary ACP-EU relations under the Cotonou Agreement, as well as the current shift to a post-Cotonou treaty. It indicates that paternalistic discourse and dependency relations are likely here to stay in the post-Cotonou phase. Critical commentators, disappointed in 2000 with the conclusion of Cotonou and its promotion of the EPAs, may find themselves equally disappointed with the realities of EU ‘development’ interventions beyond 2020.
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The European Union&s;s development policy has historically focused upon former colonies, especially those within the African, Caribbean, and Pacific (ACP) group. This chapter explores EU development policy and discourse in terms of the legitimisation of asymmetric economic relations with ACP countries. It then examines the historical foundations of Europe&s;s development discourse and how it has moralised external interventions in former colonies. The chapter thereafter explores the continued relevance of the concept of &s;dependency&s; in terms of contemporary ACP-EU relations under the Cotonou Agreement, as well as the current shift to a post-Cotonou treaty. It indicates that paternalistic discourse and dependency relations are likely here to stay in the post-Cotonou phase. Critical commentators, disappointed in 2000 with the conclusion of Cotonou and its promotion of the EPAs, may find themselves equally disappointed with the realities of EU ‘development’ interventions beyond 2020.
Key concepts: Political science