Why the Combined Field Army

Abstract : This study examines the present day need for the Combined Field Army (ROK/US). It reviews the history of the Combined Field Army (CFA), the role it has served as a deterrent force and coalition force role model. A review of the command and control structure echeloned above the CFA is made. Shortfalls in the structure are identified and evaluated with respect to a perceived need for a ground component command subordinate to the Combined Forces Command (ROK/US). A conclusion is reached that there is a definite need for a ground component command (GCC). It is posited that a GCC would be representative of the maturation of the ROK/US military and political relationship. The study concludes with a review of the Combined Forces Command command and control structure examining closely the issues of operational control versus combatant command authority of Commander-in-chief, U.S. Pacific Command; Command; Commander-in-chief, Combined Forces Command; and Commander U.S. Forces, Korea. It makes the recommendation that the Commander, U.S. Forces, Korea should have combatant command of U.S. forces in Korea and that Commander-in-chief, Combined Forces Command should have operational control of U.S. forces in Korea.