2020Data in BriefOpen access

Uncertainty analysis of a non-automatic weighing instrument from calibration data on scales according to the SIM guide

Germán Roca-Gómez, Ulises Ospino-López, Cristian Antonio Pedraza Yepes, Óscar Fabián Higuera Cobos, José Daniel Hernández-Vásquez

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

This research was motivated by technical-economic challenges imposed by mass metrology, specifically, in matters concerning calibration methods of non-automatic type weighing instruments (i.e.: digital scales). In order to contextualize the problem detected, in the industry there are different processes of mass measurement that are controlled by digital scales, such as: mass of liquids, chemicals, food, body mass of a person. In these processes, the scale is used in the following four conditions for mass measurement: (i) ascending and descending load, returned to zero; (ii) ascending and descending load, without the need to return to zero; (iii) only with ascending load and (iv) only with descending load. In this context and, maintaining the principles for the calibration of a measurement instrument in which it must be carried out under the same operating conditions as the instrument, metrology laboratories must knowing the metrological reliability (i.e.: errors and uncertainties) for each situation. This is exactly the main motivation for the development of the research. Thus, the experimental data obtained in a research laboratory under controlled environmental conditions allowed obtaining a minimum expanded uncertainty associated with the mass measurement of 0.0012 kg (k=2; confidence level: 95%).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This research was motivated by technical-economic challenges imposed by mass metrology, specifically, in matters concerning calibration methods of non-automatic type weighing instruments (i.e.: digital scales). In order to contextualize the problem detected, in the industry there are different processes of mass measurement that are controlled by digital scales, such as: mass of liquids, chemicals, food, body mass of a person. In these processes, the scale is used in the following four conditions for mass measurement: (i) ascending and descending load, returned to zero; (ii) ascending and descending load, without the need to return to zero; (iii) only with ascending load and (iv) only with descending load. In this context and, maintaining the principles for the calibration of a measurement instrument in which it must be carried out under the same operating conditions as the instrument, metrology laboratories must knowing the metrological reliability (i.e.: errors and uncertainties) for each situation. This is exactly the main motivation for the development of the research. Thus, the experimental data obtained in a research laboratory under controlled environmental conditions allowed obtaining a minimum expanded uncertainty associated with the mass measurement of 0.0012 kg (k=2; confidence level: 95%).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This research was motivated by technical-economic challenges imposed by mass metrology, specifically, in matters concerning calibration methods of non-automatic type weighing instruments (i.e.: digital scales). In order to contextualize the problem detected, in the industry there are different processes of mass measurement that are controlled by digital scales, such as: mass of liquids, chemicals, food, body mass of a person. In these processes, the scale is used in the following four conditions for mass measurement: (i) ascending and descending load, returned to zero; (ii) ascending and descending load, without the need to return to zero; (iii) only with ascending load and (iv) only with descending load. In this context and, maintaining the principles for the calibration of a measurement instrument in which it must be carried out under the same operating conditions as the instrument, metrology laboratories must knowing the metrological reliability (i.e.: errors and uncertainties) for each situation. This is exactly the main motivation for the development of the research. Thus, the experimental data obtained in a research laboratory under controlled environmental conditions allowed obtaining a minimum expanded uncertainty associated with the mass measurement of 0.0012 kg (k=2; confidence level: 95%).

Key concepts: Metrology, Calibration, Context (archaeology), Measurement uncertainty, Reliability (semiconductor), Computer science, Scale (ratio), Reliability engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Uncertainty analysis of a non-automatic weighing instrument from calibration data on scales according to the SIM guide — Research Paper | ScholarLens