Soil Evaporation Stress Determines Soil Moisture‐Evapotranspiration Coupling Strength in Land Surface Modeling
Jianzhi Dong, Paul Alan Dirmeyer, Fangni Lei, Martha C. Anderson, Thomas Holmes, Christopher Hain, Wade T. Crow
Abstract
Jianzhi Dong, Paul Alan Dirmeyer, Fangni Lei, Martha C. Anderson, Thomas Holmes, Christopher Hain, Wade T. Crow
Abstract
Abstract Model‐based estimates of soil moisture (SM)‐evapotranspiration (ET) coupling strength (ρ) vary widely and are prone to bias. Here we apply numerical modeling and remote sensing to identify the process‐level source of modeled ρ bias with the goal of improving the fidelity of current Earth system models. Results illustrate that modeled ρ is most strongly determined by soil evaporation (E) stress, and (generally positive) ρ modeling bias is attributable to the oversimplification of soil texture impacts on E stress. Based on new remotely sensed estimates of ρ, we demonstrate that removing ρ bias via a single optimized E stress parameter leads to improved ET accuracy and resolves a well‐known modeling bias in the partitioning of ET into E and T. As such, we highlight the importance of the stress function relating E and SM and its central role in regulating land‐atmosphere coupling processes impacting local climate.
OpenAlex reports 73 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Model‐based estimates of soil moisture (SM)‐evapotranspiration (ET) coupling strength (ρ) vary widely and are prone to bias. Here we apply numerical modeling and remote sensing to identify the process‐level source of modeled ρ bias with the goal of improving the fidelity of current Earth system models. Results illustrate that modeled ρ is most strongly determined by soil evaporation (E) stress, and (generally positive) ρ modeling bias is attributable to the oversimplification of soil texture impacts on E stress. Based on new remotely sensed estimates of ρ, we demonstrate that removing ρ bias via a single optimized E stress parameter leads to improved ET accuracy and resolves a well‐known modeling bias in the partitioning of ET into E and T. As such, we highlight the importance of the stress function relating E and SM and its central role in regulating land‐atmosphere coupling processes impacting local climate.
Key concepts: Evapotranspiration, Environmental science, Coupling (piping), Soil science, Evaporation, Soil texture, Stress (linguistics), Potential evaporation