Revelation and the New Testament Canon
Tobias Nicklas
Abstract
Tobias Nicklas
Abstract
This chapter first considers the historical path by which Revelation was accepted as part of the New Testament canon. The various perspectives on the book in eastern and western Christianity are noted, showing greater diversity than is sometimes thought. Second, attention is given to way patterns of interpretation in antiquity and the modern period have shaped the actual function of Revelation as a canonical text. Third, the chapter explores Revelation’s possible theological value within the New Testament and the Bible as a whole.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter first considers the historical path by which Revelation was accepted as part of the New Testament canon. The various perspectives on the book in eastern and western Christianity are noted, showing greater diversity than is sometimes thought. Second, attention is given to way patterns of interpretation in antiquity and the modern period have shaped the actual function of Revelation as a canonical text. Third, the chapter explores Revelation’s possible theological value within the New Testament and the Bible as a whole.
Key concepts: Revelation, New Testament, Canon, Interpretation (philosophy), Philosophy, Literature, Function (biology), Old Testament