2020Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceOpen access

Cryptosporidium Infections in Africa—How Important Is Zoonotic Transmission? A Review of the Evidence

Lucy J. Robertson, Øystein Haarklau Johansen, Tsegabirhan Kifleyohannes, Akinwale Michael Efunshile, Getachew Terefe

Open full text 74 citations

Abstract

Cryptosporidium, a protozoan parasite in the phylum Apicomplexa, is the etiological agent of cryptosporidiosis, an intestinal infection characterized by profuse watery diarrhea. Over 30 species of Cryptosporidium are recognized, some host specific whereas others infect a broader host range. Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum are the species most commonly associated with human infection; C. hominis is largely associated only with human infections, but C. parvum is also associated with infection in animals, particularly young ruminants. In some regions, cryptosporidiosis is a serious veterinary problem, particularly for calves and lambs. Many outbreaks of human cryptosporidiosis have been associated with zoonotic transmission following contact with infected animals. In Africa, where cryptosporidiosis is a major contributor to pediatric morbidity and mortality, evidence suggests transmission is principally anthroponotic. Given the frequent close contact between humans and animals in Africa, this apparent predominance of human-to-human transmission is both interesting and puzzling. Here, after a brief “text book” introduction to the parasite, we consider in separate sections the different aspects of relevance to Cryptosporidium transmission in African countries; describing different aspects of the various species and subtypes in human and animal infections, considering livestock management practices, and looking for any “hot spots” where zoonotic transmission has apparently occurred. Finally, we gather these different strands of evidence together to assess the reasons behind the apparent predominance of anthroponotic transmission in Africa. Reviewing the available evidence provides an opportunity to re-think transmission pathways, not only in Africa but also elsewhere, and also to pose questions. Does the predominance of human-to-human transmission reflect an absence of zoonotic C. parvum in African livestock? Are Africans less susceptible to zoonotic Cryptosporidium infection, perhaps resulting from early immunostimulation by C. hominis or due to genetic traits? Is the African environment simply more detrimental to oocyst survival? Will the hypertransmissible subtypes, currently relatively rare in Africa, be introduced, and, if so, will they fade out or establish? Our intention is not only to summarize and consolidate diverse data, but also to provide food for thought regarding transmission of a parasite that exerts a considerable impact on both human and animal health

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cryptosporidium, a protozoan parasite in the phylum Apicomplexa, is the etiological agent of cryptosporidiosis, an intestinal infection characterized by profuse watery diarrhea. Over 30 species of Cryptosporidium are recognized, some host specific whereas others infect a broader host range. Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum are the species most commonly associated with human infection; C. hominis is largely associated only with human infections, but C. parvum is also associated with infection in animals, particularly young ruminants. In some regions, cryptosporidiosis is a serious veterinary problem, particularly for calves and lambs. Many outbreaks of human cryptosporidiosis have been associated with zoonotic transmission following contact with infected animals. In Africa, where cryptosporidiosis is a major contributor to pediatric morbidity and mortality, evidence suggests transmission is principally anthroponotic. Given the frequent close contact between humans and animals in Africa, this apparent predominance of human-to-human transmission is both interesting and puzzling. Here, after a brief “text book” introduction to the parasite, we consider in separate sections the different aspects of relevance to Cryptosporidium transmission in African countries; describing different aspects of the various species and subtypes in human and animal infections, considering livestock management practices, and looking for any “hot spots” where zoonotic transmission has apparently occurred. Finally, we gather these different strands of evidence together to assess the reasons behind the apparent predominance of anthroponotic transmission in Africa. Reviewing the available evidence provides an opportunity to re-think transmission pathways, not only in Africa but also elsewhere, and also to pose questions. Does the predominance of human-to-human transmission reflect an absence of zoonotic C. parvum in African livestock? Are Africans less susceptible to zoonotic Cryptosporidium infection, perhaps resulting from early immunostimulation by C. hominis or due to genetic traits? Is the African environment simply more detrimental to oocyst survival? Will the hypertransmissible subtypes, currently relatively rare in Africa, be introduced, and, if so, will they fade out or establish? Our intention is not only to summarize and consolidate diverse data, but also to provide food for thought regarding transmission of a parasite that exerts a considerable impact on both human and animal health

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 74 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cryptosporidium, a protozoan parasite in the phylum Apicomplexa, is the etiological agent of cryptosporidiosis, an intestinal infection characterized by profuse watery diarrhea. Over 30 species of Cryptosporidium are recognized, some host specific whereas others infect a broader host range. Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum are the species most commonly associated with human infection; C. hominis is largely associated only with human infections, but C. parvum is also associated with infection in animals, particularly young ruminants. In some regions, cryptosporidiosis is a serious veterinary problem, particularly for calves and lambs. Many outbreaks of human cryptosporidiosis have been associated with zoonotic transmission following contact with infected animals. In Africa, where cryptosporidiosis is a major contributor to pediatric morbidity and mortality, evidence suggests transmission is principally anthroponotic. Given the frequent close contact between humans and animals in Africa, this apparent predominance of human-to-human transmission is both interesting and puzzling. Here, after a brief “text book” introduction to the parasite, we consider in separate sections the different aspects of relevance to Cryptosporidium transmission in African countries; describing different aspects of the various species and subtypes in human and animal infections, considering livestock management practices, and looking for any “hot spots” where zoonotic transmission has apparently occurred. Finally, we gather these different strands of evidence together to assess the reasons behind the apparent predominance of anthroponotic transmission in Africa. Reviewing the available evidence provides an opportunity to re-think transmission pathways, not only in Africa but also elsewhere, and also to pose questions. Does the predominance of human-to-human transmission reflect an absence of zoonotic C. parvum in African livestock? Are Africans less susceptible to zoonotic Cryptosporidium infection, perhaps resulting from early immunostimulation by C. hominis or due to genetic traits? Is the African environment simply more detrimental to oocyst survival? Will the hypertransmissible subtypes, currently relatively rare in Africa, be introduced, and, if so, will they fade out or establish? Our intention is not only to summarize and consolidate diverse data, but also to provide food for thought regarding transmission of a parasite that exerts a considerable impact on both human and animal health

Key concepts: Cryptosporidium, Transmission (telecommunications), Cryptosporidium parvum, Outbreak, Zoonosis, Biology, Livestock, Diarrhea

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cryptosporidium Infections in Africa—How Important Is Zoonotic Transmission? A Review of the Evidence — Research Paper | ScholarLens