2020European Journal of Public HealthOpen access

Discount Rate Determination for Economic Evaluations in HTA in the Philippines

Yves Miel H Zuñiga, Arthur Kraft, Deinzel R. Uezono, Margarita Fajardo, S Obmana, Anne Julienne Genuino, Á Guerrero

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

Abstract To inform the development of a reference case for economic evaluation, we explored various approaches to determine a base case discount rate and rate options for discounting benefits and costs. We conducted literature review and expert consultations to list approaches to determine base case discount rates, noting the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. The same methods were used to identify whether different discount rates would be applied to costs and benefits. We computed a social rate of time preference using the Ramsey formula: rc = ρ+μg, where ρ = pure rate of time preference μ= elasticity of the marginal utility of consumption and g= growth rate in per capita income. We assumed ρ = 1%, μ = 1.4% consistent with international practice, but used actual g of the Philippines of 4.5%. We compared this with the official social discount rate and with rate most commonly used internationally. These options were presented to the Philippine Health Technology Assessment Council for decisionmaking. Based on reviewed literature, 10 out of 22 countries used a 3.0% to 3.5% discount rate while 18 countries from the same pool applied equal discount rates for both costs and outcomes. The official social discount rate (SDR) prescribed by the Philippine National Economic Development Authority is 10% for all social investments. Upon input of the values, rc was calculated at 7%, which is above the international norm but below the official rate. Four discount rate options were identified: 3%, 3.5%, 7% and 10%. Evidence suggested using a discount rate higher than 3% to 3.5% for low-to-middle income countries. A more conservative rate based on the Ramsey formula of 7% base case discount rate was selected in performing economic evaluations. Sensitivity analysis was set between 3% and 10% to allow benchmarking with international practice and with the official SDR, respectively. Given Philippines' early HTA implementation phase, it was agreed to subject these rates to regular review. Key messages Setting a discount rate in economic evaluations is a crucial process for HTA institutionalization. Discount rate determination heavily relies on decision context a country considers most relevant.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract To inform the development of a reference case for economic evaluation, we explored various approaches to determine a base case discount rate and rate options for discounting benefits and costs. We conducted literature review and expert consultations to list approaches to determine base case discount rates, noting the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. The same methods were used to identify whether different discount rates would be applied to costs and benefits. We computed a social rate of time preference using the Ramsey formula: rc = ρ+μg, where ρ = pure rate of time preference μ= elasticity of the marginal utility of consumption and g= growth rate in per capita income. We assumed ρ = 1%, μ = 1.4% consistent with international practice, but used actual g of the Philippines of 4.5%. We compared this with the official social discount rate and with rate most commonly used internationally. These options were presented to the Philippine Health Technology Assessment Council for decisionmaking. Based on reviewed literature, 10 out of 22 countries used a 3.0% to 3.5% discount rate while 18 countries from the same pool applied equal discount rates for both costs and outcomes. The official social discount rate (SDR) prescribed by the Philippine National Economic Development Authority is 10% for all social investments. Upon input of the values, rc was calculated at 7%, which is above the international norm but below the official rate. Four discount rate options were identified: 3%, 3.5%, 7% and 10%. Evidence suggested using a discount rate higher than 3% to 3.5% for low-to-middle income countries. A more conservative rate based on the Ramsey formula of 7% base case discount rate was selected in performing economic evaluations. Sensitivity analysis was set between 3% and 10% to allow benchmarking with international practice and with the official SDR, respectively. Given Philippines' early HTA implementation phase, it was agreed to subject these rates to regular review. Key messages Setting a discount rate in economic evaluations is a crucial process for HTA institutionalization. Discount rate determination heavily relies on decision context a country considers most relevant.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract To inform the development of a reference case for economic evaluation, we explored various approaches to determine a base case discount rate and rate options for discounting benefits and costs. We conducted literature review and expert consultations to list approaches to determine base case discount rates, noting the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. The same methods were used to identify whether different discount rates would be applied to costs and benefits. We computed a social rate of time preference using the Ramsey formula: rc = ρ+μg, where ρ = pure rate of time preference μ= elasticity of the marginal utility of consumption and g= growth rate in per capita income. We assumed ρ = 1%, μ = 1.4% consistent with international practice, but used actual g of the Philippines of 4.5%. We compared this with the official social discount rate and with rate most commonly used internationally. These options were presented to the Philippine Health Technology Assessment Council for decisionmaking. Based on reviewed literature, 10 out of 22 countries used a 3.0% to 3.5% discount rate while 18 countries from the same pool applied equal discount rates for both costs and outcomes. The official social discount rate (SDR) prescribed by the Philippine National Economic Development Authority is 10% for all social investments. Upon input of the values, rc was calculated at 7%, which is above the international norm but below the official rate. Four discount rate options were identified: 3%, 3.5%, 7% and 10%. Evidence suggested using a discount rate higher than 3% to 3.5% for low-to-middle income countries. A more conservative rate based on the Ramsey formula of 7% base case discount rate was selected in performing economic evaluations. Sensitivity analysis was set between 3% and 10% to allow benchmarking with international practice and with the official SDR, respectively. Given Philippines' early HTA implementation phase, it was agreed to subject these rates to regular review. Key messages Setting a discount rate in economic evaluations is a crucial process for HTA institutionalization. Discount rate determination heavily relies on decision context a country considers most relevant.

Key concepts: Social discount rate, Time preference, Discounting, Economics, Marginal utility, Per capita, Consumption (sociology), Cost–benefit analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discount Rate Determination for Economic Evaluations in HTA in the Philippines — Research Paper | ScholarLens