2020Unpublished venueRequires access

Author’s Comment—Sarah Warshauer Freedman

John R. Hayes, Richard E. Young, Michele L. Matchett, Maggie McCaffrey, Cynthia Cochran, Thomas Hajduk

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study comes from my dissertation on the evaluation of student writing. I think I cared and still care about that topic because when I reached a stage where I consciously wanted to write better (I think not until I was an M.A. student in English literature at The University of Chicago), I realized that what was stopping me and what had always stopped me from being able to improve my writing was my inability to articulate what made some pieces I wrote better than others. And my teachers’ comments never seemed to help me very much. By studying texts and teachers’ judgments, I thought, I would be able to find some clues to what good writing was.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study comes from my dissertation on the evaluation of student writing. I think I cared and still care about that topic because when I reached a stage where I consciously wanted to write better (I think not until I was an M.A. student in English literature at The University of Chicago), I realized that what was stopping me and what had always stopped me from being able to improve my writing was my inability to articulate what made some pieces I wrote better than others. And my teachers’ comments never seemed to help me very much. By studying texts and teachers’ judgments, I thought, I would be able to find some clues to what good writing was.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study comes from my dissertation on the evaluation of student writing. I think I cared and still care about that topic because when I reached a stage where I consciously wanted to write better (I think not until I was an M.A. student in English literature at The University of Chicago), I realized that what was stopping me and what had always stopped me from being able to improve my writing was my inability to articulate what made some pieces I wrote better than others. And my teachers’ comments never seemed to help me very much. By studying texts and teachers’ judgments, I thought, I would be able to find some clues to what good writing was.

Key concepts: Freedman, Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, History, Psychology, Archaeology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Author’s Comment—Sarah Warshauer Freedman — Research Paper | ScholarLens