Author’s Comment—Sarah Warshauer Freedman
John R. Hayes, Richard E. Young, Michele L. Matchett, Maggie McCaffrey, Cynthia Cochran, Thomas Hajduk
Abstract
John R. Hayes, Richard E. Young, Michele L. Matchett, Maggie McCaffrey, Cynthia Cochran, Thomas Hajduk
Abstract
This study comes from my dissertation on the evaluation of student writing. I think I cared and still care about that topic because when I reached a stage where I consciously wanted to write better (I think not until I was an M.A. student in English literature at The University of Chicago), I realized that what was stopping me and what had always stopped me from being able to improve my writing was my inability to articulate what made some pieces I wrote better than others. And my teachers’ comments never seemed to help me very much. By studying texts and teachers’ judgments, I thought, I would be able to find some clues to what good writing was.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study comes from my dissertation on the evaluation of student writing. I think I cared and still care about that topic because when I reached a stage where I consciously wanted to write better (I think not until I was an M.A. student in English literature at The University of Chicago), I realized that what was stopping me and what had always stopped me from being able to improve my writing was my inability to articulate what made some pieces I wrote better than others. And my teachers’ comments never seemed to help me very much. By studying texts and teachers’ judgments, I thought, I would be able to find some clues to what good writing was.
Key concepts: Freedman, Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, History, Psychology, Archaeology