2020LINGUISTICAOpen access

THE INTERRUPTION USED IN MIXED GENDER IN INI TALK SHOW ON NET TV

DONNY JOHANNES P, Siti Aisah Ginting, Muhammad Natsir

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Talk show is a tool of people communicates to convey the important information such as successes, or the phenomenon in society. In a talk show, they use language to start conversation between the host and the guest stars who will talk about a particular topic. Every human being communicates using different languages to achieve the purposes. In this case, the language phenomenon often occurs in a conversation. The language phenomenon often happened in conversation is interruption. Based on the background above this research investigates the interruption used by the participants in Ini Talk Show on Net TV. The objectives of this research are to identify the types and functions of interruption used by the participants in the talk show. This research used descriptive qualitative as a method. The form of the data were utterances that used by the participants in two episodes of Ini Talk Show. The researcher was the primary instrument of this research. The theories that used to analyzing the data are Ferguson (1977), Murata (1983), Kennedy and Camden (1983), Han Z. Li (2001), Zimmermen and West (1975). The result of the research, the researcher found four types of interruption used by the participants in the talk show are simple interruption (23), overlap interruption (70), butting-in interruption (7), and silent interruption (13). There were 113 data of interruption found in this research; the most type which appeared (70) times by the participants is overlap interruption, because each participant cannot wait to give his or her opinion toward the topic of the conversation. In this case, the current speaker does not give the turns before his or her finishing the utterance but the interrupter still disrupted and talk in sametime. Furthermore, two functions of interruption are found in this talk show are cooperative interruption consist of agreement (27), assistance (10), and clarification (29), while intrusive interruption divided into disagreement (3), floor taking (21), topic change (16), and tangentialization (7). The most function that appeared is clarification. Clarification appeared (29) times, the participants do interruption not only to shows the words does not understand but also to emphasizes the important words that get from the participant messages. Keywords: Conversation, Interruption, Participants, Ini Talk Show

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Talk show is a tool of people communicates to convey the important information such as successes, or the phenomenon in society. In a talk show, they use language to start conversation between the host and the guest stars who will talk about a particular topic. Every human being communicates using different languages to achieve the purposes. In this case, the language phenomenon often occurs in a conversation. The language phenomenon often happened in conversation is interruption. Based on the background above this research investigates the interruption used by the participants in Ini Talk Show on Net TV. The objectives of this research are to identify the types and functions of interruption used by the participants in the talk show. This research used descriptive qualitative as a method. The form of the data were utterances that used by the participants in two episodes of Ini Talk Show. The researcher was the primary instrument of this research. The theories that used to analyzing the data are Ferguson (1977), Murata (1983), Kennedy and Camden (1983), Han Z. Li (2001), Zimmermen and West (1975). The result of the research, the researcher found four types of interruption used by the participants in the talk show are simple interruption (23), overlap interruption (70), butting-in interruption (7), and silent interruption (13). There were 113 data of interruption found in this research; the most type which appeared (70) times by the participants is overlap interruption, because each participant cannot wait to give his or her opinion toward the topic of the conversation. In this case, the current speaker does not give the turns before his or her finishing the utterance but the interrupter still disrupted and talk in sametime. Furthermore, two functions of interruption are found in this talk show are cooperative interruption consist of agreement (27), assistance (10), and clarification (29), while intrusive interruption divided into disagreement (3), floor taking (21), topic change (16), and tangentialization (7). The most function that appeared is clarification. Clarification appeared (29) times, the participants do interruption not only to shows the words does not understand but also to emphasizes the important words that get from the participant messages. Keywords: Conversation, Interruption, Participants, Ini Talk Show

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Talk show is a tool of people communicates to convey the important information such as successes, or the phenomenon in society. In a talk show, they use language to start conversation between the host and the guest stars who will talk about a particular topic. Every human being communicates using different languages to achieve the purposes. In this case, the language phenomenon often occurs in a conversation. The language phenomenon often happened in conversation is interruption. Based on the background above this research investigates the interruption used by the participants in Ini Talk Show on Net TV. The objectives of this research are to identify the types and functions of interruption used by the participants in the talk show. This research used descriptive qualitative as a method. The form of the data were utterances that used by the participants in two episodes of Ini Talk Show. The researcher was the primary instrument of this research. The theories that used to analyzing the data are Ferguson (1977), Murata (1983), Kennedy and Camden (1983), Han Z. Li (2001), Zimmermen and West (1975). The result of the research, the researcher found four types of interruption used by the participants in the talk show are simple interruption (23), overlap interruption (70), butting-in interruption (7), and silent interruption (13). There were 113 data of interruption found in this research; the most type which appeared (70) times by the participants is overlap interruption, because each participant cannot wait to give his or her opinion toward the topic of the conversation. In this case, the current speaker does not give the turns before his or her finishing the utterance but the interrupter still disrupted and talk in sametime. Furthermore, two functions of interruption are found in this talk show are cooperative interruption consist of agreement (27), assistance (10), and clarification (29), while intrusive interruption divided into disagreement (3), floor taking (21), topic change (16), and tangentialization (7). The most function that appeared is clarification. Clarification appeared (29) times, the participants do interruption not only to shows the words does not understand but also to emphasizes the important words that get from the participant messages. Keywords: Conversation, Interruption, Participants, Ini Talk Show

Key concepts: Conversation, Phenomenon, Conversation analysis, Psychology, Qualitative research, Linguistics, Social psychology, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE INTERRUPTION USED IN MIXED GENDER IN INI TALK SHOW ON NET TV — Research Paper | ScholarLens