2020Unpublished venueRequires access

Classical Qurʾanic exegesis and women

Hadia Mubarak

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Moving away from binary conceptions of Qurʾanic tafsīr as either patriarchal or egalitarian, this chapter seeks to complicate current narratives on exegetical interpretations of women and gender in the Qurʾan. By exploring medieval exegetical texts between the 9th and 14th centuries on critical verses related to gender, this chapter illustrates the influence of exegetes’ socio-cultural milieus on their commentaries on gender roles and hierarchies. Despite the influence of their patriarchal contexts, medieval exegetes also reflected a consistent concern with women’s legal rights, such as kind companionship and fair treatment within a marriage. Hence, the genre of law critically intervenes in medieval Qurʾanic exegesis, informing the way exegetes interpreted key terms in the Qurʾan. This chapter provides a close analysis of exegetical interpretations on three key verses related to polygyny (Q. 4:3), men’s disciplinary authority over women (Q. 4:34), and men’s nushūz or turbulence (Q. 4:128). It argues that while the interpretive pluralism of tafsīr appears to diminish on women’s issues, there were and continue to be important outliers to dominant interpretations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Moving away from binary conceptions of Qurʾanic tafsīr as either patriarchal or egalitarian, this chapter seeks to complicate current narratives on exegetical interpretations of women and gender in the Qurʾan. By exploring medieval exegetical texts between the 9th and 14th centuries on critical verses related to gender, this chapter illustrates the influence of exegetes’ socio-cultural milieus on their commentaries on gender roles and hierarchies. Despite the influence of their patriarchal contexts, medieval exegetes also reflected a consistent concern with women’s legal rights, such as kind companionship and fair treatment within a marriage. Hence, the genre of law critically intervenes in medieval Qurʾanic exegesis, informing the way exegetes interpreted key terms in the Qurʾan. This chapter provides a close analysis of exegetical interpretations on three key verses related to polygyny (Q. 4:3), men’s disciplinary authority over women (Q. 4:34), and men’s nushūz or turbulence (Q. 4:128). It argues that while the interpretive pluralism of tafsīr appears to diminish on women’s issues, there were and continue to be important outliers to dominant interpretations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Moving away from binary conceptions of Qurʾanic tafsīr as either patriarchal or egalitarian, this chapter seeks to complicate current narratives on exegetical interpretations of women and gender in the Qurʾan. By exploring medieval exegetical texts between the 9th and 14th centuries on critical verses related to gender, this chapter illustrates the influence of exegetes’ socio-cultural milieus on their commentaries on gender roles and hierarchies. Despite the influence of their patriarchal contexts, medieval exegetes also reflected a consistent concern with women’s legal rights, such as kind companionship and fair treatment within a marriage. Hence, the genre of law critically intervenes in medieval Qurʾanic exegesis, informing the way exegetes interpreted key terms in the Qurʾan. This chapter provides a close analysis of exegetical interpretations on three key verses related to polygyny (Q. 4:3), men’s disciplinary authority over women (Q. 4:34), and men’s nushūz or turbulence (Q. 4:128). It argues that while the interpretive pluralism of tafsīr appears to diminish on women’s issues, there were and continue to be important outliers to dominant interpretations.

Key concepts: Exegesis, Philosophy, Literature, Art, Theology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Classical Qurʾanic exegesis and women — Research Paper | ScholarLens