2020•Ocular Immunology and InflammationRequires access

Tocilizumab versus Rituximab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Steroid-resistant Graves’ Orbitopathy

Amin Bennedjaï, Nacim Bouheraoua, Marc Gatfossé, Laurence Dupasquier-Fediaevsky, Marie‐Hélène Errera, M. Tazartès, Vincent Michel Borderie, Quentin Hennocq, Azeddine Dellal, Sébastien Rivière, Emmanuel Héron, O. Fain, Arsène MEKINIAN

Open publisher page 30 citations

Abstract

Introduction To describe the efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with Graves’ orbitopathy resistant or dependent to steroids and compare to rituximab treated patients.Patients and Methods Graves’s orbitopathy response was considered as decrease of at least 2 points of the CAS.Results Twenty-one patients were included, 7 patients were treated with tocilizumab and 14 with rituximab. The primary was achieved in all 7 patients (100%) on tocilizumab and 9 out of 14 patients on (64%) rituximab (p = .17). Mean change in CAS was consistent with a decrease of 3.3 ± 0.5 points in patients on tocilizumab versus 2.5 ± 1.9 in patients on rituximab (p = .07). One patient on tocilizumab (14%) and 4 patients (29%) on rituximab experienced significant relapse during the follow-up. The difference in relapse-free survival was not significant in patients on tocilizumab (10.8 ± 4 months) compared with rituximab (17.88 ± 3.66).Conclusion We showed a significant improvement in the CAS, visual acuity, diplopia, and proptosis with both tocilizumab and rituximab.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction To describe the efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with Graves’ orbitopathy resistant or dependent to steroids and compare to rituximab treated patients.Patients and Methods Graves’s orbitopathy response was considered as decrease of at least 2 points of the CAS.Results Twenty-one patients were included, 7 patients were treated with tocilizumab and 14 with rituximab. The primary was achieved in all 7 patients (100%) on tocilizumab and 9 out of 14 patients on (64%) rituximab (p = .17). Mean change in CAS was consistent with a decrease of 3.3 ± 0.5 points in patients on tocilizumab versus 2.5 ± 1.9 in patients on rituximab (p = .07). One patient on tocilizumab (14%) and 4 patients (29%) on rituximab experienced significant relapse during the follow-up. The difference in relapse-free survival was not significant in patients on tocilizumab (10.8 ± 4 months) compared with rituximab (17.88 ± 3.66).Conclusion We showed a significant improvement in the CAS, visual acuity, diplopia, and proptosis with both tocilizumab and rituximab.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction To describe the efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with Graves’ orbitopathy resistant or dependent to steroids and compare to rituximab treated patients.Patients and Methods Graves’s orbitopathy response was considered as decrease of at least 2 points of the CAS.Results Twenty-one patients were included, 7 patients were treated with tocilizumab and 14 with rituximab. The primary was achieved in all 7 patients (100%) on tocilizumab and 9 out of 14 patients on (64%) rituximab (p = .17). Mean change in CAS was consistent with a decrease of 3.3 ± 0.5 points in patients on tocilizumab versus 2.5 ± 1.9 in patients on rituximab (p = .07). One patient on tocilizumab (14%) and 4 patients (29%) on rituximab experienced significant relapse during the follow-up. The difference in relapse-free survival was not significant in patients on tocilizumab (10.8 ± 4 months) compared with rituximab (17.88 ± 3.66).Conclusion We showed a significant improvement in the CAS, visual acuity, diplopia, and proptosis with both tocilizumab and rituximab.

Key concepts: Tocilizumab, Medicine, Rituximab, Diplopia, Internal medicine, Graves' ophthalmopathy, Surgery, Monoclonal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tocilizumab versus Rituximab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Steroid-resistant Graves’ Orbitopathy — Research Paper | ScholarLens