2019Journal of Entomology and Zoology StudiesOpen access

Evaluation of bio-efficacy of new generation insecticides, botanicals and microbial insecticides on leaf webber of amaranth

Pooru Muralikrishna, Thomas Biju Mathew, Ambily Paul, P. Nithya

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

Hymenia recurvalis is a major leaf eating pest on vegetable amaranth. A laboratory study was conducted on evaluation of bio-efficacy of new generation insecticides against H. recurvalis. New generation insecticides (chlorantraniliprole - 0.006%, novaluron - 0.015%, flubendiamide - 0.0096%, spinosad - 0.015%,emamectin benzoate - 0.002%, indoxacarb - 0.015%, thiacloprid - 0.036%, and fipronil - 0.01%), botanicals (NSK 5 ml L-1 and oxuron 5 ml L-1) and microbial insecticide, Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki were evaluated in vitro. Chlorantraniliprole 0.006%, flubendiamide 0.0096%, emamectin benzoate 0.002%, indoxacarb 0.015%, thiacloprid 0.036%, fipronil 0.01% and B.t k 5 ml L-1 were found to be effective under laboratory conditions and field studies were conducted using these effective insecticides. Under field studies, flubendiamide 0.0096% was found effective in managing H. recurvalis with least toxicity to non-target organisms such as spiders.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Hymenia recurvalis is a major leaf eating pest on vegetable amaranth. A laboratory study was conducted on evaluation of bio-efficacy of new generation insecticides against H. recurvalis. New generation insecticides (chlorantraniliprole - 0.006%, novaluron - 0.015%, flubendiamide - 0.0096%, spinosad - 0.015%,emamectin benzoate - 0.002%, indoxacarb - 0.015%, thiacloprid - 0.036%, and fipronil - 0.01%), botanicals (NSK 5 ml L-1 and oxuron 5 ml L-1) and microbial insecticide, Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki were evaluated in vitro. Chlorantraniliprole 0.006%, flubendiamide 0.0096%, emamectin benzoate 0.002%, indoxacarb 0.015%, thiacloprid 0.036%, fipronil 0.01% and B.t k 5 ml L-1 were found to be effective under laboratory conditions and field studies were conducted using these effective insecticides. Under field studies, flubendiamide 0.0096% was found effective in managing H. recurvalis with least toxicity to non-target organisms such as spiders.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Hymenia recurvalis is a major leaf eating pest on vegetable amaranth. A laboratory study was conducted on evaluation of bio-efficacy of new generation insecticides against H. recurvalis. New generation insecticides (chlorantraniliprole - 0.006%, novaluron - 0.015%, flubendiamide - 0.0096%, spinosad - 0.015%,emamectin benzoate - 0.002%, indoxacarb - 0.015%, thiacloprid - 0.036%, and fipronil - 0.01%), botanicals (NSK 5 ml L-1 and oxuron 5 ml L-1) and microbial insecticide, Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki were evaluated in vitro. Chlorantraniliprole 0.006%, flubendiamide 0.0096%, emamectin benzoate 0.002%, indoxacarb 0.015%, thiacloprid 0.036%, fipronil 0.01% and B.t k 5 ml L-1 were found to be effective under laboratory conditions and field studies were conducted using these effective insecticides. Under field studies, flubendiamide 0.0096% was found effective in managing H. recurvalis with least toxicity to non-target organisms such as spiders.

Key concepts: Indoxacarb, Thiacloprid, Fipronil, Novaluron, Spinosad, Toxicology, Acetamiprid, Amaranth

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of bio-efficacy of new generation insecticides, botanicals and microbial insecticides on leaf webber of amaranth — Research Paper | ScholarLens