2017International Journal of Chemical StudiesOpen access

Efficacy and Economics of different insecticides against Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench)

Rajesh Aarwe, Rajesh Pachori, Anil Kumar Sharma, Anil Kurmi, N. R. Rangare

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

An experiment was directed to observe the efficacy of some insecticides against shoot and fruit borer of okra during kharif season of 2014 at the Entomological experimental field, JNKVV Jabalpur (M.P.). The treatments emamectin benzoate 5% SG @ 12 g a.i./ha. recorded higher fruit yield (58.00 q/ha) as compared to control (23.69 q/ha). followed by emamectin benzoate 5% SG @ 10 g a.i./ha (52.00 q/ha) and triazophos 40% EC @ 400 g a.i./ha (50.00 q/ha) both were found to at par each other. Whereas other insecticide Thiamethoxam 25% WG @ 50 g a.i./ha (41.53 q/ha), thiamethoxam 25% WG @ 25 g a.i./ha (38.70 q/ha) and imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 21.36 g a.i./ha (36.65 q/ha) was also shows better results. The highest net return was obtained from emamectin benzoate 5% SG @ 12 g a.i./ha but the cost benefit ratio was lowest (1:9.83). And the maximum cost benefit ratio was obtained in triazophos 40% EC @ 400 g a.i./ha (1:15.60) due to lower cost than others.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An experiment was directed to observe the efficacy of some insecticides against shoot and fruit borer of okra during kharif season of 2014 at the Entomological experimental field, JNKVV Jabalpur (M.P.). The treatments emamectin benzoate 5% SG @ 12 g a.i./ha. recorded higher fruit yield (58.00 q/ha) as compared to control (23.69 q/ha). followed by emamectin benzoate 5% SG @ 10 g a.i./ha (52.00 q/ha) and triazophos 40% EC @ 400 g a.i./ha (50.00 q/ha) both were found to at par each other. Whereas other insecticide Thiamethoxam 25% WG @ 50 g a.i./ha (41.53 q/ha), thiamethoxam 25% WG @ 25 g a.i./ha (38.70 q/ha) and imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 21.36 g a.i./ha (36.65 q/ha) was also shows better results. The highest net return was obtained from emamectin benzoate 5% SG @ 12 g a.i./ha but the cost benefit ratio was lowest (1:9.83). And the maximum cost benefit ratio was obtained in triazophos 40% EC @ 400 g a.i./ha (1:15.60) due to lower cost than others.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An experiment was directed to observe the efficacy of some insecticides against shoot and fruit borer of okra during kharif season of 2014 at the Entomological experimental field, JNKVV Jabalpur (M.P.). The treatments emamectin benzoate 5% SG @ 12 g a.i./ha. recorded higher fruit yield (58.00 q/ha) as compared to control (23.69 q/ha). followed by emamectin benzoate 5% SG @ 10 g a.i./ha (52.00 q/ha) and triazophos 40% EC @ 400 g a.i./ha (50.00 q/ha) both were found to at par each other. Whereas other insecticide Thiamethoxam 25% WG @ 50 g a.i./ha (41.53 q/ha), thiamethoxam 25% WG @ 25 g a.i./ha (38.70 q/ha) and imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 21.36 g a.i./ha (36.65 q/ha) was also shows better results. The highest net return was obtained from emamectin benzoate 5% SG @ 12 g a.i./ha but the cost benefit ratio was lowest (1:9.83). And the maximum cost benefit ratio was obtained in triazophos 40% EC @ 400 g a.i./ha (1:15.60) due to lower cost than others.

Key concepts: Thiamethoxam, Abelmoschus, Imidacloprid, Kharif crop, Abamectin, Toxicology, Emamectin benzoate, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy and Economics of different insecticides against Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) — Research Paper | ScholarLens