2019UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia)Open access

The development and testing of a diagnostic tool for assessing VAT compliance costs : pilot study findings

Richard Highfield, Chris Evans, Michael Walpole

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

This article presents the findings of a pilot research project designed to evaluate the merits of a prototype diagnostic tool for \ngauging the nature and likely overall incidence of value added tax (VAT) compliance costs at the country level, and to assess \nits use in comparative cross-country assessments to promote reform. The project was conducted across 13 countries, \nrepresenting a mix of advanced and developing economies from all continents.1 Drawing on feedback from participants in the \nproject, the findings appear broadly aligned with community and government expectations, and participants were generally of \nthe view that the tool displays merit in assessing the likely aggregate (or relative) VAT compliance burden and its main drivers. \nThe VAT diagnostic tool survey undertaken as part of the pilot also sought to gather insights into the degree of government \nand institutional recognition and attention being given to address tax compliance costs as a means of gauging a sense of the \n‘maturity’ of each country’s approach to compliance burden management, which was found to be weak in a number of the \nparticipating countries.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article presents the findings of a pilot research project designed to evaluate the merits of a prototype diagnostic tool for \ngauging the nature and likely overall incidence of value added tax (VAT) compliance costs at the country level, and to assess \nits use in comparative cross-country assessments to promote reform. The project was conducted across 13 countries, \nrepresenting a mix of advanced and developing economies from all continents.1 Drawing on feedback from participants in the \nproject, the findings appear broadly aligned with community and government expectations, and participants were generally of \nthe view that the tool displays merit in assessing the likely aggregate (or relative) VAT compliance burden and its main drivers. \nThe VAT diagnostic tool survey undertaken as part of the pilot also sought to gather insights into the degree of government \nand institutional recognition and attention being given to address tax compliance costs as a means of gauging a sense of the \n‘maturity’ of each country’s approach to compliance burden management, which was found to be weak in a number of the \nparticipating countries.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article presents the findings of a pilot research project designed to evaluate the merits of a prototype diagnostic tool for \ngauging the nature and likely overall incidence of value added tax (VAT) compliance costs at the country level, and to assess \nits use in comparative cross-country assessments to promote reform. The project was conducted across 13 countries, \nrepresenting a mix of advanced and developing economies from all continents.1 Drawing on feedback from participants in the \nproject, the findings appear broadly aligned with community and government expectations, and participants were generally of \nthe view that the tool displays merit in assessing the likely aggregate (or relative) VAT compliance burden and its main drivers. \nThe VAT diagnostic tool survey undertaken as part of the pilot also sought to gather insights into the degree of government \nand institutional recognition and attention being given to address tax compliance costs as a means of gauging a sense of the \n‘maturity’ of each country’s approach to compliance burden management, which was found to be weak in a number of the \nparticipating countries.

Key concepts: Compliance (psychology), Public economics, Government (linguistics), Business, Economics, Psychology, Philosophy, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The development and testing of a diagnostic tool for assessing VAT compliance costs : pilot study findings — Research Paper | ScholarLens