2020Entomological ReviewRequires access

Computed Microtomography of the Third Instar Larva of the Eastern Fruit Fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel, 1912) (Diptera, Tephritidae), with New Data on Morphological Characters of Fruit Fly Larvae Useful for Species Diagnostics

T. V. Galinskaya, O. G. Ovtshinnikova, I. O. Kamaev, M. Yu. Arapova, Lyudmila Yu. Kryuchkova

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The muscular system of the larva of the eastern fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel, 1912) (Diptera, Tephritidae), a quarantine pest of many fruit crops, was studied by X-ray computed microtomography (micro-CT). The larval muscles of Bactrocera dorsalis were compared with those of Drosophila melanogaster Meigen, 1830 (Diptera, Drosophilidae), since the latter is the most thoroughly studied larva among the Diptera Cyclorrhapha. Although the two species belong to different unrelated families, they were found to possess similar sets of muscles, differing largely in places of attachment and degree of development. The more strongly developed muscles associated with the cephaloskeleton and mouth hooks in Bactrocera dorsalis as compared with Drosophila melanogaster may be related to the different density of their substrates: the larvae of Bactrocera dorsalis make tunnels in fruit tissues and (before pupation) in soil, while those of Drosophila melanogaster develop in decaying substrates.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The muscular system of the larva of the eastern fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel, 1912) (Diptera, Tephritidae), a quarantine pest of many fruit crops, was studied by X-ray computed microtomography (micro-CT). The larval muscles of Bactrocera dorsalis were compared with those of Drosophila melanogaster Meigen, 1830 (Diptera, Drosophilidae), since the latter is the most thoroughly studied larva among the Diptera Cyclorrhapha. Although the two species belong to different unrelated families, they were found to possess similar sets of muscles, differing largely in places of attachment and degree of development. The more strongly developed muscles associated with the cephaloskeleton and mouth hooks in Bactrocera dorsalis as compared with Drosophila melanogaster may be related to the different density of their substrates: the larvae of Bactrocera dorsalis make tunnels in fruit tissues and (before pupation) in soil, while those of Drosophila melanogaster develop in decaying substrates.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The muscular system of the larva of the eastern fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel, 1912) (Diptera, Tephritidae), a quarantine pest of many fruit crops, was studied by X-ray computed microtomography (micro-CT). The larval muscles of Bactrocera dorsalis were compared with those of Drosophila melanogaster Meigen, 1830 (Diptera, Drosophilidae), since the latter is the most thoroughly studied larva among the Diptera Cyclorrhapha. Although the two species belong to different unrelated families, they were found to possess similar sets of muscles, differing largely in places of attachment and degree of development. The more strongly developed muscles associated with the cephaloskeleton and mouth hooks in Bactrocera dorsalis as compared with Drosophila melanogaster may be related to the different density of their substrates: the larvae of Bactrocera dorsalis make tunnels in fruit tissues and (before pupation) in soil, while those of Drosophila melanogaster develop in decaying substrates.

Key concepts: Bactrocera dorsalis, Tephritidae, Biology, Larva, Instar, Ceratitis capitata, Fly larvae, Botany

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Computed Microtomography of the Third Instar Larva of the Eastern Fruit Fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel, 1912) (Diptera, Tephritidae), with New Data on Morphological Characters of Fruit Fly Larvae Useful for Species Diagnostics — Research Paper | ScholarLens