2018•International Journal of Chemical StudiesOpen access

Bioefficacy of newer insecticides against tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum (mill) under protected cultivation

SD Sapkal, MM Sonkamble, BB Gaikwad

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

For tomato fruit borer management seven newer insecticides were taken viz., spinosad 45% SC, chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC, emamectin benzoate 5% SG, indoxacarb 14.5% SC, cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD, spinatoram 11.7% SC and flubendiamide 39.35% SG. The total three numbers of sprays were done. The treatment Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC, Flubendiamide 39.35% SG, Emamectin benzoate 5% SG, Indoxacarb 14.5% SC and Spinatoram 11.7 SC% was significantly at par with each other. Among them chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC found most effective than all other treatment. The descending order of efficacy was recorded in all three sprays as chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC > flubendiamide 39.35% SG > emamectin benzoate 5% SG > indoxacarb 14.5% SC > spinatoram 11.7% SC > cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD > spinosad 45% SC.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For tomato fruit borer management seven newer insecticides were taken viz., spinosad 45% SC, chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC, emamectin benzoate 5% SG, indoxacarb 14.5% SC, cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD, spinatoram 11.7% SC and flubendiamide 39.35% SG. The total three numbers of sprays were done. The treatment Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC, Flubendiamide 39.35% SG, Emamectin benzoate 5% SG, Indoxacarb 14.5% SC and Spinatoram 11.7 SC% was significantly at par with each other. Among them chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC found most effective than all other treatment. The descending order of efficacy was recorded in all three sprays as chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC > flubendiamide 39.35% SG > emamectin benzoate 5% SG > indoxacarb 14.5% SC > spinatoram 11.7% SC > cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD > spinosad 45% SC.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For tomato fruit borer management seven newer insecticides were taken viz., spinosad 45% SC, chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC, emamectin benzoate 5% SG, indoxacarb 14.5% SC, cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD, spinatoram 11.7% SC and flubendiamide 39.35% SG. The total three numbers of sprays were done. The treatment Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC, Flubendiamide 39.35% SG, Emamectin benzoate 5% SG, Indoxacarb 14.5% SC and Spinatoram 11.7 SC% was significantly at par with each other. Among them chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC found most effective than all other treatment. The descending order of efficacy was recorded in all three sprays as chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC > flubendiamide 39.35% SG > emamectin benzoate 5% SG > indoxacarb 14.5% SC > spinatoram 11.7% SC > cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD > spinosad 45% SC.

Key concepts: Indoxacarb, Spinosad, Helicoverpa armigera, Emamectin benzoate, Emamectin, Toxicology, Lycopersicon, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioefficacy of newer insecticides against tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum (mill) under protected cultivation — Research Paper | ScholarLens