2020•Unpublished venueRequires access

The Geoid and Ocean Cieculation

R. S. Nerem, Chester J. Koblinsky

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter describes the relationship between the ocean circulation and the geoid, reviews the methods commonly used for determining the circulation using classical oceanographic techniques and satellite altimetry, and discusses the latest techniques for simultaneously estimating the circulation and the geoid. While conceptually the determination of the ocean circulation using satellite altimetry is simple, the influence of errors in the determination of the satellite position, errors in the model for the geoid, and errors in the environmental corrections make the task of accurately measuring the ocean circulation quite difficult. Presently, errors in the best available geoid models are larger than the ocean circulation signal for roughly degrees 15 and higher, except in some local areas, such as the Gulf Stream, where the geoid is better known from surface measurements. The measurement of the ocean circulation has been one of the principal goals of physical oceanographers for many years.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter describes the relationship between the ocean circulation and the geoid, reviews the methods commonly used for determining the circulation using classical oceanographic techniques and satellite altimetry, and discusses the latest techniques for simultaneously estimating the circulation and the geoid. While conceptually the determination of the ocean circulation using satellite altimetry is simple, the influence of errors in the determination of the satellite position, errors in the model for the geoid, and errors in the environmental corrections make the task of accurately measuring the ocean circulation quite difficult. Presently, errors in the best available geoid models are larger than the ocean circulation signal for roughly degrees 15 and higher, except in some local areas, such as the Gulf Stream, where the geoid is better known from surface measurements. The measurement of the ocean circulation has been one of the principal goals of physical oceanographers for many years.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter describes the relationship between the ocean circulation and the geoid, reviews the methods commonly used for determining the circulation using classical oceanographic techniques and satellite altimetry, and discusses the latest techniques for simultaneously estimating the circulation and the geoid. While conceptually the determination of the ocean circulation using satellite altimetry is simple, the influence of errors in the determination of the satellite position, errors in the model for the geoid, and errors in the environmental corrections make the task of accurately measuring the ocean circulation quite difficult. Presently, errors in the best available geoid models are larger than the ocean circulation signal for roughly degrees 15 and higher, except in some local areas, such as the Gulf Stream, where the geoid is better known from surface measurements. The measurement of the ocean circulation has been one of the principal goals of physical oceanographers for many years.

Key concepts: Geoid, Geodesy, Geology, Oceanography, Geophysics, Measured depth

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Geoid and Ocean Cieculation — Research Paper | ScholarLens