2020Biocontrol ScienceOpen access

Evaluation of Legiolert for Quantification of Legionella pneumophila from Bath Water Samples

Hiroaki Inoue, Masumi Baba, SEINA TAYAMA

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

Testing for Legionella spp. in public bath water samples is regulated in Japan. In this study, we used a total of 132 public bath water samples to compare the performance of Legiolert® and the conventional plate culture method for the enumeration of Legionella pneumophila. When Legiolert and plate culturing were performed at the same detection limit, L. pneumophila was detected in 26.5% of 132 samples by Legiolert, while 12.9% contained Legionella spp. (11.4% contained L. pneumophila) based on the plate culture method. Moreover, results of 83.3% of the total samples were consistent between the two methods, meaning that they were both positive or both negative. In this study, we demonstrated that Legiolert is a simpler and more effective method of monitoring for L. pneumophila in bath water samples.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Testing for Legionella spp. in public bath water samples is regulated in Japan. In this study, we used a total of 132 public bath water samples to compare the performance of Legiolert® and the conventional plate culture method for the enumeration of Legionella pneumophila. When Legiolert and plate culturing were performed at the same detection limit, L. pneumophila was detected in 26.5% of 132 samples by Legiolert, while 12.9% contained Legionella spp. (11.4% contained L. pneumophila) based on the plate culture method. Moreover, results of 83.3% of the total samples were consistent between the two methods, meaning that they were both positive or both negative. In this study, we demonstrated that Legiolert is a simpler and more effective method of monitoring for L. pneumophila in bath water samples.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Testing for Legionella spp. in public bath water samples is regulated in Japan. In this study, we used a total of 132 public bath water samples to compare the performance of Legiolert® and the conventional plate culture method for the enumeration of Legionella pneumophila. When Legiolert and plate culturing were performed at the same detection limit, L. pneumophila was detected in 26.5% of 132 samples by Legiolert, while 12.9% contained Legionella spp. (11.4% contained L. pneumophila) based on the plate culture method. Moreover, results of 83.3% of the total samples were consistent between the two methods, meaning that they were both positive or both negative. In this study, we demonstrated that Legiolert is a simpler and more effective method of monitoring for L. pneumophila in bath water samples.

Key concepts: Legionella pneumophila, Legionella, Enumeration, Microbiology, Biology, Veterinary medicine, Mathematics, Bacteria

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Legiolert for Quantification of Legionella pneumophila from Bath Water Samples — Research Paper | ScholarLens