Measurement Data-Driven Life-Cycle Management of Railway Track
Johannes Neuhold, Matthias Landgraf, Stefan Marschnig, Peter Veit
Abstract
Johannes Neuhold, Matthias Landgraf, Stefan Marschnig, Peter Veit
Abstract
Track engineers face increasing cost pressure and budget restrictions in their work today. This leads to growing difficulty in legitimizing crucial maintenance and renewal measures. As a result, infrastructure managers must ensure they invest all available financial resources as sustainably and efficiently as possible. These boundary conditions require an objective tool enabling both a component-specific condition evaluation and preventive maintenance with renewal planning. The present research introduces such a tool for railway tracks based on innovative track data analyses. This tool includes time-series analyses for predicting future quality behavior. Consequently, the technical necessity of maintenance actions can be derived for every specific track section. In addition, these technical evaluations are combined with economic and operational considerations to plan reasonable maintenance lengths for different track components in the next few years. In a further step, business evaluations by means of annuity monitoring are executed to determine whether ongoing track maintenance or complete track renewal is the most economical solution. This methodology also allows calculating the economic damage caused by neglecting the ideal point in time for reinvestment. On the basis of this economic damage, it is possible to rank projects by priority in the case of insufficient budgets and to ensure that all available resources are invested in the most reasonable manner possible. Furthermore, such analyses clearly show that when a specific degradation level of railway track is reached track renewal is more economic in relation to life-cycle costs than ongoing maintenance.
OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Track engineers face increasing cost pressure and budget restrictions in their work today. This leads to growing difficulty in legitimizing crucial maintenance and renewal measures. As a result, infrastructure managers must ensure they invest all available financial resources as sustainably and efficiently as possible. These boundary conditions require an objective tool enabling both a component-specific condition evaluation and preventive maintenance with renewal planning. The present research introduces such a tool for railway tracks based on innovative track data analyses. This tool includes time-series analyses for predicting future quality behavior. Consequently, the technical necessity of maintenance actions can be derived for every specific track section. In addition, these technical evaluations are combined with economic and operational considerations to plan reasonable maintenance lengths for different track components in the next few years. In a further step, business evaluations by means of annuity monitoring are executed to determine whether ongoing track maintenance or complete track renewal is the most economical solution. This methodology also allows calculating the economic damage caused by neglecting the ideal point in time for reinvestment. On the basis of this economic damage, it is possible to rank projects by priority in the case of insufficient budgets and to ensure that all available resources are invested in the most reasonable manner possible. Furthermore, such analyses clearly show that when a specific degradation level of railway track is reached track renewal is more economic in relation to life-cycle costs than ongoing maintenance.
Key concepts: Track (disk drive), Risk analysis (engineering), Transport engineering, Sustainability, Plan (archaeology), Quality (philosophy), Computer science, Operations research