2020Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons (Case Western Reserve University)Open access

Toward a Role for Protest in Environmental Law

Emily Hammond

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The story of environmental law closely coincides with that of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which has doubtless made many contributions to improved governance and enhanced environmental protection.In this symposium tribute to the EPA's fiftieth anniversary, however, I invite a renewed look at the role of protest in environmental law-both as an integral part of the development of environmental law and as an enduring critique of it.This approach demands of traditional legal scholarship that it interrogate its discomfort with direct-action methods; in the environmental law arena, it asks for both a deeper theoretization of protest and a renewed commitment to principles of environmental justice.Using examples from the environmental protest traditions of central Appalachia, I explore how those traditions have shaped environmental law and how the promise of environmental law has fallen short.These examples also make plain that the narrative of civil disobedience as "outside" of the legal system in contrast to participatory activities "within" the system is a false dichotomy.Indeed, the coordinated efforts among civil disobedients, local environmental movements, and impact litigators suggests the further need to theorize and operationalize a role for protest in environmental law.Ultimately, this Article calls for such a research agenda.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The story of environmental law closely coincides with that of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which has doubtless made many contributions to improved governance and enhanced environmental protection.In this symposium tribute to the EPA's fiftieth anniversary, however, I invite a renewed look at the role of protest in environmental law-both as an integral part of the development of environmental law and as an enduring critique of it.This approach demands of traditional legal scholarship that it interrogate its discomfort with direct-action methods; in the environmental law arena, it asks for both a deeper theoretization of protest and a renewed commitment to principles of environmental justice.Using examples from the environmental protest traditions of central Appalachia, I explore how those traditions have shaped environmental law and how the promise of environmental law has fallen short.These examples also make plain that the narrative of civil disobedience as "outside" of the legal system in contrast to participatory activities "within" the system is a false dichotomy.Indeed, the coordinated efforts among civil disobedients, local environmental movements, and impact litigators suggests the further need to theorize and operationalize a role for protest in environmental law.Ultimately, this Article calls for such a research agenda.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The story of environmental law closely coincides with that of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which has doubtless made many contributions to improved governance and enhanced environmental protection.In this symposium tribute to the EPA's fiftieth anniversary, however, I invite a renewed look at the role of protest in environmental law-both as an integral part of the development of environmental law and as an enduring critique of it.This approach demands of traditional legal scholarship that it interrogate its discomfort with direct-action methods; in the environmental law arena, it asks for both a deeper theoretization of protest and a renewed commitment to principles of environmental justice.Using examples from the environmental protest traditions of central Appalachia, I explore how those traditions have shaped environmental law and how the promise of environmental law has fallen short.These examples also make plain that the narrative of civil disobedience as "outside" of the legal system in contrast to participatory activities "within" the system is a false dichotomy.Indeed, the coordinated efforts among civil disobedients, local environmental movements, and impact litigators suggests the further need to theorize and operationalize a role for protest in environmental law.Ultimately, this Article calls for such a research agenda.

Key concepts: Environmental law, Environmental governance, Environmental justice, Law, Agency (philosophy), Scholarship, Environmental studies, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Toward a Role for Protest in Environmental Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens