2020IET Radar Sonar & NavigationRequires access

Comparison of three widely used multi‐GNSS real‐time single‐frequency precise point positioning models using the International GNSS Service real‐time service

Ahao Wang, Junping Chen, Yize Zhang, Jiexian Wang

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Real‐time single‐frequency precise point positioning (RT‐SFPPP) of low‐cost has been attracting increasing attention in numerous global navigation satellite system (GNSS) applications. Nowadays, three multi‐GNSS RT‐SFPPP models are widely applied, i.e. ionosphere‐corrected (IC), ionospherefree (IF) and ionosphere‐weighted (IW) models. A comprehensive evaluation of the three models using CLK93 products is performed in the aspect of observation residuals, positioning accuracy and convergence. Data sets with quad‐system are collected from 16 multi‐GNSS experiments (MGEX) stations and are analysed in the simulated kinematic precise point positioning (PPP). Besides, kinematic PPP for a 5‐h shipborne data set is also conducted. Experimental results show that the positioning accuracy of IW model using MGEX data is better than that of both IC and IF models. Regarding the kinematic shipborne test, positioning accuracy of IF/IW model is of 0.27/0.26, 0.21/0.26 and 0.49/0.48 m for the N, E and U components, respectively, which is much better than that of IC model. As for average convergence time, IW model shows the best performance, which is at least 25% faster than the IF model. Different from both IF and IW models, the amplification of ionospheric errors has some impact on the positioning performance of the IC model at different frequencies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Real‐time single‐frequency precise point positioning (RT‐SFPPP) of low‐cost has been attracting increasing attention in numerous global navigation satellite system (GNSS) applications. Nowadays, three multi‐GNSS RT‐SFPPP models are widely applied, i.e. ionosphere‐corrected (IC), ionospherefree (IF) and ionosphere‐weighted (IW) models. A comprehensive evaluation of the three models using CLK93 products is performed in the aspect of observation residuals, positioning accuracy and convergence. Data sets with quad‐system are collected from 16 multi‐GNSS experiments (MGEX) stations and are analysed in the simulated kinematic precise point positioning (PPP). Besides, kinematic PPP for a 5‐h shipborne data set is also conducted. Experimental results show that the positioning accuracy of IW model using MGEX data is better than that of both IC and IF models. Regarding the kinematic shipborne test, positioning accuracy of IF/IW model is of 0.27/0.26, 0.21/0.26 and 0.49/0.48 m for the N, E and U components, respectively, which is much better than that of IC model. As for average convergence time, IW model shows the best performance, which is at least 25% faster than the IF model. Different from both IF and IW models, the amplification of ionospheric errors has some impact on the positioning performance of the IC model at different frequencies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Real‐time single‐frequency precise point positioning (RT‐SFPPP) of low‐cost has been attracting increasing attention in numerous global navigation satellite system (GNSS) applications. Nowadays, three multi‐GNSS RT‐SFPPP models are widely applied, i.e. ionosphere‐corrected (IC), ionospherefree (IF) and ionosphere‐weighted (IW) models. A comprehensive evaluation of the three models using CLK93 products is performed in the aspect of observation residuals, positioning accuracy and convergence. Data sets with quad‐system are collected from 16 multi‐GNSS experiments (MGEX) stations and are analysed in the simulated kinematic precise point positioning (PPP). Besides, kinematic PPP for a 5‐h shipborne data set is also conducted. Experimental results show that the positioning accuracy of IW model using MGEX data is better than that of both IC and IF models. Regarding the kinematic shipborne test, positioning accuracy of IF/IW model is of 0.27/0.26, 0.21/0.26 and 0.49/0.48 m for the N, E and U components, respectively, which is much better than that of IC model. As for average convergence time, IW model shows the best performance, which is at least 25% faster than the IF model. Different from both IF and IW models, the amplification of ionospheric errors has some impact on the positioning performance of the IC model at different frequencies.

Key concepts: GNSS applications, Precise Point Positioning, Service (business), Computer science, Geodesy, Real-time computing, Global Positioning System, Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of three widely used multi‐GNSS real‐time single‐frequency precise point positioning models using the International GNSS Service real‐time service — Research Paper | ScholarLens