Doomed to fail: the sad epistemological fate
John Turri
Abstract
Open-access reader
John Turri
Abstract
Open-access reader
For beings like us, no ontological argument can possibly succeed.They are doomed to fail.The point of an ontological argument is to enable nonempirical knowledge of its conclusion, namely, that God exists.But no ontological argument could possibly enable us to know its conclusion nonempirically, and so must fail in that sense.An ontological argument will fail even if it is perfectly sound and begs no questions.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
For beings like us, no ontological argument can possibly succeed.They are doomed to fail.The point of an ontological argument is to enable nonempirical knowledge of its conclusion, namely, that God exists.But no ontological argument could possibly enable us to know its conclusion nonempirically, and so must fail in that sense.An ontological argument will fail even if it is perfectly sound and begs no questions.
Key concepts: Epistemology, Too big to fail, Philosophy, Economics, Macroeconomics, Financial crisis