1998Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons (Case Western Reserve University)Open access

Hybrid Personal Jurisdiction: It's Not General Jurisdiction, or Specific Jurisdiction, but Is It Constitutional

Linda Sandstrom Simard

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

0.The Illinois long-arm statute does not contain a hybrid jurisdiction provision like the one quoted in the text.See ILL.CoMP.STAT.§ 110/2-209 (West 1985).The court in the Lemke case upheld the exercise of jurisdiction on the ground that Dr. Patel was "doing business" in Illinois and thus could be subject to general jurisdiction. "-UNIF. INTERSTATE AND INT'L PROCEDUREAcT § 1.03, 13 U.L.A. 361 (1962).The following state statutes have long-arm provisions that are similar to the language quoted in the text: ALASKA STAT.§ 09.05.015(a)(4) (Michie 1996); CONN.GEN.STAT.ANN.§ 52-59b(3) (West 1991); D.C. CODE ANN.§ 13-423(a)(4) (1981); FLA.STAT.ANN.§ 48.193(l)(f) (West 1994); GA.CODE ANN.§ 9-10-91(3) (1982); IND.CODE ANN.§ 4.4(A)(3) (West 1996); KAN.STAT.ANN.§ 60-308(b)(7) (1994); Ky.REV.STAT.ANN.§ 454.210(2)(a)(4) & (5) (Banks-Baldwin 1994); LA.REv.STAT.ANN.§ 13:3201(a)(4) (West 1983); MASS.GEN.LAws ANN.ch.223A § 3(d) (West 1985); NEB.REV.STAT.§ 25-536(I)(d) (1995); N.Y.C.P.L.R. § 302(a)(3) (McKinney 1996); N.C.GEN.STAT.§ 1-75.4(4)(1997); OHIO REV.CODE ANN.§ 2307.382(A)(4)-(5)(Anderson 1995); OR.REV.STAT.§ 43(D) (1995); S.C. CODE ANN.§ 36-2-803(I)(d) (Law Co-op.1996); VA.CODE ANN.§ 8.01-328.1(A)(4)-(5)(Michie 1992); V.I.CODE ANN.tit. 5, § 4903(4) (1996); W.VA. CODE § 56-3-33(a)(4)-(5) (1997); Wis.STAT.ANN.§ 801.05(4) (West 1994).Two states have adopted long-arm provisions that extend jurisdiction to any defendant who: Causes tortious injury in the State or outside of the State by an act or omission outside the State if the person regularly does or solicits business, engages in any other persistent course of conduct in the State or derives substantial revenue from services or things used or consumed in the State.DEL.CODE ANN.tit. 10, § 3104(c)(4) (1996); see also MD.CODE ANN., CTS.& JUD.PROC.§ 6-103(b)(4) (1997).These provisions are significantly broader than the uniform statute because they are not limited to injuries occurring within the forum state.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

0.The Illinois long-arm statute does not contain a hybrid jurisdiction provision like the one quoted in the text.See ILL.CoMP.STAT.§ 110/2-209 (West 1985).The court in the Lemke case upheld the exercise of jurisdiction on the ground that Dr. Patel was "doing business" in Illinois and thus could be subject to general jurisdiction. "-UNIF. INTERSTATE AND INT'L PROCEDUREAcT § 1.03, 13 U.L.A. 361 (1962).The following state statutes have long-arm provisions that are similar to the language quoted in the text: ALASKA STAT.§ 09.05.015(a)(4) (Michie 1996); CONN.GEN.STAT.ANN.§ 52-59b(3) (West 1991); D.C. CODE ANN.§ 13-423(a)(4) (1981); FLA.STAT.ANN.§ 48.193(l)(f) (West 1994); GA.CODE ANN.§ 9-10-91(3) (1982); IND.CODE ANN.§ 4.4(A)(3) (West 1996); KAN.STAT.ANN.§ 60-308(b)(7) (1994); Ky.REV.STAT.ANN.§ 454.210(2)(a)(4) & (5) (Banks-Baldwin 1994); LA.REv.STAT.ANN.§ 13:3201(a)(4) (West 1983); MASS.GEN.LAws ANN.ch.223A § 3(d) (West 1985); NEB.REV.STAT.§ 25-536(I)(d) (1995); N.Y.C.P.L.R. § 302(a)(3) (McKinney 1996); N.C.GEN.STAT.§ 1-75.4(4)(1997); OHIO REV.CODE ANN.§ 2307.382(A)(4)-(5)(Anderson 1995); OR.REV.STAT.§ 43(D) (1995); S.C. CODE ANN.§ 36-2-803(I)(d) (Law Co-op.1996); VA.CODE ANN.§ 8.01-328.1(A)(4)-(5)(Michie 1992); V.I.CODE ANN.tit. 5, § 4903(4) (1996); W.VA. CODE § 56-3-33(a)(4)-(5) (1997); Wis.STAT.ANN.§ 801.05(4) (West 1994).Two states have adopted long-arm provisions that extend jurisdiction to any defendant who: Causes tortious injury in the State or outside of the State by an act or omission outside the State if the person regularly does or solicits business, engages in any other persistent course of conduct in the State or derives substantial revenue from services or things used or consumed in the State.DEL.CODE ANN.tit. 10, § 3104(c)(4) (1996); see also MD.CODE ANN., CTS.& JUD.PROC.§ 6-103(b)(4) (1997).These provisions are significantly broader than the uniform statute because they are not limited to injuries occurring within the forum state.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

0.The Illinois long-arm statute does not contain a hybrid jurisdiction provision like the one quoted in the text.See ILL.CoMP.STAT.§ 110/2-209 (West 1985).The court in the Lemke case upheld the exercise of jurisdiction on the ground that Dr. Patel was "doing business" in Illinois and thus could be subject to general jurisdiction. "-UNIF. INTERSTATE AND INT'L PROCEDUREAcT § 1.03, 13 U.L.A. 361 (1962).The following state statutes have long-arm provisions that are similar to the language quoted in the text: ALASKA STAT.§ 09.05.015(a)(4) (Michie 1996); CONN.GEN.STAT.ANN.§ 52-59b(3) (West 1991); D.C. CODE ANN.§ 13-423(a)(4) (1981); FLA.STAT.ANN.§ 48.193(l)(f) (West 1994); GA.CODE ANN.§ 9-10-91(3) (1982); IND.CODE ANN.§ 4.4(A)(3) (West 1996); KAN.STAT.ANN.§ 60-308(b)(7) (1994); Ky.REV.STAT.ANN.§ 454.210(2)(a)(4) & (5) (Banks-Baldwin 1994); LA.REv.STAT.ANN.§ 13:3201(a)(4) (West 1983); MASS.GEN.LAws ANN.ch.223A § 3(d) (West 1985); NEB.REV.STAT.§ 25-536(I)(d) (1995); N.Y.C.P.L.R. § 302(a)(3) (McKinney 1996); N.C.GEN.STAT.§ 1-75.4(4)(1997); OHIO REV.CODE ANN.§ 2307.382(A)(4)-(5)(Anderson 1995); OR.REV.STAT.§ 43(D) (1995); S.C. CODE ANN.§ 36-2-803(I)(d) (Law Co-op.1996); VA.CODE ANN.§ 8.01-328.1(A)(4)-(5)(Michie 1992); V.I.CODE ANN.tit. 5, § 4903(4) (1996); W.VA. CODE § 56-3-33(a)(4)-(5) (1997); Wis.STAT.ANN.§ 801.05(4) (West 1994).Two states have adopted long-arm provisions that extend jurisdiction to any defendant who: Causes tortious injury in the State or outside of the State by an act or omission outside the State if the person regularly does or solicits business, engages in any other persistent course of conduct in the State or derives substantial revenue from services or things used or consumed in the State.DEL.CODE ANN.tit. 10, § 3104(c)(4) (1996); see also MD.CODE ANN., CTS.& JUD.PROC.§ 6-103(b)(4) (1997).These provisions are significantly broader than the uniform statute because they are not limited to injuries occurring within the forum state.

Key concepts: Jurisdiction, Constitutionality, Personal jurisdiction, Original jurisdiction, Law, Political science, Supreme court

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hybrid Personal Jurisdiction: It's Not General Jurisdiction, or Specific Jurisdiction, but Is It Constitutional — Research Paper | ScholarLens