1978Psychologica BelgicaOpen access

Interaction of Cue Saliency, Stimulus Unitization and Familiarization in Concept Identification : Attention or Memory Phenomenon?

André Vandierendonck

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The effects of cue saliency, stimulus unitization and familiarization on the number of errors to criterion in some concept identification tasks were studied. Cue saliency, familiarization, and their interaction had significant effects. Further analysis showed that cue saliency was only effective in the first concept problem (no pretaining was given) with nonunitized stimulus material. The overall effect of cue saliency appeared when the salient dimension was irrelevant as well as when it was relevant, and prediction of second task performance on the basis of the first task performance according to an additivity of cues model failed. These results were interpreted as evidence against the additivity of cues hypothesis and the selective attention view of concept learning. The findings are shown to confirm the hypothesis that information processing during concept learning is principally guided by memory operations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effects of cue saliency, stimulus unitization and familiarization on the number of errors to criterion in some concept identification tasks were studied. Cue saliency, familiarization, and their interaction had significant effects. Further analysis showed that cue saliency was only effective in the first concept problem (no pretaining was given) with nonunitized stimulus material. The overall effect of cue saliency appeared when the salient dimension was irrelevant as well as when it was relevant, and prediction of second task performance on the basis of the first task performance according to an additivity of cues model failed. These results were interpreted as evidence against the additivity of cues hypothesis and the selective attention view of concept learning. The findings are shown to confirm the hypothesis that information processing during concept learning is principally guided by memory operations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effects of cue saliency, stimulus unitization and familiarization on the number of errors to criterion in some concept identification tasks were studied. Cue saliency, familiarization, and their interaction had significant effects. Further analysis showed that cue saliency was only effective in the first concept problem (no pretaining was given) with nonunitized stimulus material. The overall effect of cue saliency appeared when the salient dimension was irrelevant as well as when it was relevant, and prediction of second task performance on the basis of the first task performance according to an additivity of cues model failed. These results were interpreted as evidence against the additivity of cues hypothesis and the selective attention view of concept learning. The findings are shown to confirm the hypothesis that information processing during concept learning is principally guided by memory operations.

Key concepts: Psychology, Stimulus (psychology), Salient, Cognitive psychology, Selective attention, Phenomenon, Cognition, Neuroscience

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interaction of Cue Saliency, Stimulus Unitization and Familiarization in Concept Identification : Attention or Memory Phenomenon? — Research Paper | ScholarLens