Weed dynamics and productivity under different tillage and weed-management practices in maize (Zea mays)wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping sequence
Lobzang Stanzen, Anil Kumar, B.C. Sharma, R. Puniya, Ashu Sharma
Abstract
Open-access reader
Lobzang Stanzen, Anil Kumar, B.C. Sharma, R. Puniya, Ashu Sharma
Abstract
Open-access reader
A field experiment was conducted during 201314 and 201415 at Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agriculture Science and Technology of Jammu, to study the effect of tillage and weed-management practices on weed dy- namics and productivity in maize (Zea mays L.)wheat {Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol.] cropping se- quence. Weed density, weed biomass, grain and stover yields of maize were found statistically at par in continu- ous conventional tillage and rotational conventional tillage in maize and zero tillage in wheat under maize. How- ever, in wheat the density and biomass of grassy weeds were found significantly lowest under continuous zero till- age preceded by zero tillage or conventional tillage in maize. The different tillage treatments had non-significant effect on density and biomass of broad-leaf weeds and yields (grain and straw) of wheat. Amongst the weed-man- agement practices, 2 hand-weedings 15 and 30 days after sowing (DAS) in maize and application of metribuzin (200 g/ha) at 30 DAS in wheat significantly reduced weed density, biomass and recorded significantly higher yields of maize and wheat respectively, over weedy check in both maize and wheat. Among the tillage treatments, adoption of zero tillage in maize and conventional tillage in wheat also proved economically beneficial with the highest benefit: cost ratio and the lowest cost of cultivation in maizewheat system followed by continuous zero tillage in both the crop. However, in weed management, application of atrazine 1 kg/ha in maize and metribuzin (200 g/ha) in wheat resulted the highest benefit: cost ratio and net returns followed by 2 hand-weedings. At the end of the maizewheat cropping cycles, both tillage and weed-management practices did not influence on status of bulk density of the soil.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A field experiment was conducted during 201314 and 201415 at Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agriculture Science and Technology of Jammu, to study the effect of tillage and weed-management practices on weed dy- namics and productivity in maize (Zea mays L.)wheat {Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol.] cropping se- quence. Weed density, weed biomass, grain and stover yields of maize were found statistically at par in continu- ous conventional tillage and rotational conventional tillage in maize and zero tillage in wheat under maize. How- ever, in wheat the density and biomass of grassy weeds were found significantly lowest under continuous zero till- age preceded by zero tillage or conventional tillage in maize. The different tillage treatments had non-significant effect on density and biomass of broad-leaf weeds and yields (grain and straw) of wheat. Amongst the weed-man- agement practices, 2 hand-weedings 15 and 30 days after sowing (DAS) in maize and application of metribuzin (200 g/ha) at 30 DAS in wheat significantly reduced weed density, biomass and recorded significantly higher yields of maize and wheat respectively, over weedy check in both maize and wheat. Among the tillage treatments, adoption of zero tillage in maize and conventional tillage in wheat also proved economically beneficial with the highest benefit: cost ratio and the lowest cost of cultivation in maizewheat system followed by continuous zero tillage in both the crop. However, in weed management, application of atrazine 1 kg/ha in maize and metribuzin (200 g/ha) in wheat resulted the highest benefit: cost ratio and net returns followed by 2 hand-weedings. At the end of the maizewheat cropping cycles, both tillage and weed-management practices did not influence on status of bulk density of the soil.
Key concepts: Agronomy, Tillage, Weed, Conventional tillage, No-till farming, Weed control, Sowing, Metribuzin