2018International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAHOpen access

AIRFOIL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DESIGN OF HIGH PERFORMANCE, LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER PROPELLERS

Umunna J Reuben, Koju Hiraki, Miyamoto Shohei

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

A propeller was designed using 2D airfoil data obtained from a panel method numeric code. The propeller was designed to operate at 75% chord based Reynolds number of 20k. At low Reynolds numbers <40k, there are no publicly available 2D airfoil force data largely because of inherent difficulty in their measurement. Theoretical prediction of the propeller’s peak efficiency was 0.67 while experiment results was 0.58. To improve the propeller efficiency by using better performing airfoils, six (6) airfoils of varying thickness and camber were studied. Three of the six airfoils were chosen and used in the design of three propellers - a single airfoil for each propeller design. The propellers were designed to operate at Reynolds number of 30k at 0.75 radius and the 2D airfoil force data used for the designs were obtained from a numeric code. Theoretical predictions of efficiency were all > 81% in each of the designed propellers.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A propeller was designed using 2D airfoil data obtained from a panel method numeric code. The propeller was designed to operate at 75% chord based Reynolds number of 20k. At low Reynolds numbers <40k, there are no publicly available 2D airfoil force data largely because of inherent difficulty in their measurement. Theoretical prediction of the propeller’s peak efficiency was 0.67 while experiment results was 0.58. To improve the propeller efficiency by using better performing airfoils, six (6) airfoils of varying thickness and camber were studied. Three of the six airfoils were chosen and used in the design of three propellers - a single airfoil for each propeller design. The propellers were designed to operate at Reynolds number of 30k at 0.75 radius and the 2D airfoil force data used for the designs were obtained from a numeric code. Theoretical predictions of efficiency were all > 81% in each of the designed propellers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A propeller was designed using 2D airfoil data obtained from a panel method numeric code. The propeller was designed to operate at 75% chord based Reynolds number of 20k. At low Reynolds numbers <40k, there are no publicly available 2D airfoil force data largely because of inherent difficulty in their measurement. Theoretical prediction of the propeller’s peak efficiency was 0.67 while experiment results was 0.58. To improve the propeller efficiency by using better performing airfoils, six (6) airfoils of varying thickness and camber were studied. Three of the six airfoils were chosen and used in the design of three propellers - a single airfoil for each propeller design. The propellers were designed to operate at Reynolds number of 30k at 0.75 radius and the 2D airfoil force data used for the designs were obtained from a numeric code. Theoretical predictions of efficiency were all > 81% in each of the designed propellers.

Key concepts: Airfoil, Propeller, Reynolds number, Chord (peer-to-peer), Marine engineering, Propulsive efficiency, Camber (aerodynamics), Computational fluid dynamics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
AIRFOIL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DESIGN OF HIGH PERFORMANCE, LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER PROPELLERS — Research Paper | ScholarLens