2020Unpublished venueRequires access

The Noun Clause: the That-Clause and the Wh-Clause

E. O. Winter

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

These are the clauses which function syntactically as nominals in the larger clause at the structures of subject, object, complement, adjective complement and ‘object’ of the preposition. There are two kinds of noun clause which have subordinating conjunctions. The first is the exocentric that-clause, and the second is the endocentric wh-clauses which are traditionally described as indirect questions. One of the minor embarrassments of teaching a parsing analysis is the similarity of some of the signaling items. In the noun clause signalled by that-conjunction, however, the clause is self-contained in that it does not enter into similar constituent relations with the noun head outside the boundary of its clause. There are five contextual points to be noted of the use of that-clauses as sole complement of the verb be. Noun clauses can be divided into two kinds according to whether or not they require to be lexically realized by an adjoining clause or clauses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

These are the clauses which function syntactically as nominals in the larger clause at the structures of subject, object, complement, adjective complement and ‘object’ of the preposition. There are two kinds of noun clause which have subordinating conjunctions. The first is the exocentric that-clause, and the second is the endocentric wh-clauses which are traditionally described as indirect questions. One of the minor embarrassments of teaching a parsing analysis is the similarity of some of the signaling items. In the noun clause signalled by that-conjunction, however, the clause is self-contained in that it does not enter into similar constituent relations with the noun head outside the boundary of its clause. There are five contextual points to be noted of the use of that-clauses as sole complement of the verb be. Noun clauses can be divided into two kinds according to whether or not they require to be lexically realized by an adjoining clause or clauses.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

These are the clauses which function syntactically as nominals in the larger clause at the structures of subject, object, complement, adjective complement and ‘object’ of the preposition. There are two kinds of noun clause which have subordinating conjunctions. The first is the exocentric that-clause, and the second is the endocentric wh-clauses which are traditionally described as indirect questions. One of the minor embarrassments of teaching a parsing analysis is the similarity of some of the signaling items. In the noun clause signalled by that-conjunction, however, the clause is self-contained in that it does not enter into similar constituent relations with the noun head outside the boundary of its clause. There are five contextual points to be noted of the use of that-clauses as sole complement of the verb be. Noun clauses can be divided into two kinds according to whether or not they require to be lexically realized by an adjoining clause or clauses.

Key concepts: Non-finite clause, Dependent clause, Relative clause, Linguistics, Noun, Establishment Clause, Nominalization, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Noun Clause: the That-Clause and the Wh-Clause — Research Paper | ScholarLens