The Nature of Offense
Andrew Sneddon
Abstract
Andrew Sneddon
Abstract
A theory of “lean offense” is described and defended. This view presents typical offense experiences as a combination of a feeling that it is putatively bad to experience and a judgment that this feeling signals that something offensive has occurred and that the feeling is a morally appropriate response to this. Offense is shown to be a reactive attitude, in P.F. Strawson’s sense. Because of this, the account of lean offense is not an analysis of our offense experiences but rather a commentary on them. Attention is drawn to the importance of doing justice to both the agential and patiential aspects of offense, following the lead of Soran Reader.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A theory of “lean offense” is described and defended. This view presents typical offense experiences as a combination of a feeling that it is putatively bad to experience and a judgment that this feeling signals that something offensive has occurred and that the feeling is a morally appropriate response to this. Offense is shown to be a reactive attitude, in P.F. Strawson’s sense. Because of this, the account of lean offense is not an analysis of our offense experiences but rather a commentary on them. Attention is drawn to the importance of doing justice to both the agential and patiential aspects of offense, following the lead of Soran Reader.
Key concepts: Psychology