2018The International Encyclopedia of AnthropologyRequires access

Ritual and Fictive Kinship

Cristian Alvarado Leyton

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Kinship relationships beyond descent and affinity are commonly defined as ritual and fictive kinship. In a context of general empirical and theoretical neglect, the importance of ritual and fictive kinship for the study of society and power has been shown in research on its classical examples of godparenthood, fosterage, adoption, milk kinship, and blood brotherhood next to locally specific forms. Besides the function of establishing alliances even across class, ethnic, or religious boundaries, and an astonishing flexibility in adapting to specific interests and cultural contexts, the potential to render power for fictive and ritual kin became evident. Schneider's critique of the anthropology of kinship leads the way both to study fictive and ritual kinship in its own right and to chance a unified analysis of kinship that recognizes the significance that the people themselves attribute to such ties.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Kinship relationships beyond descent and affinity are commonly defined as ritual and fictive kinship. In a context of general empirical and theoretical neglect, the importance of ritual and fictive kinship for the study of society and power has been shown in research on its classical examples of godparenthood, fosterage, adoption, milk kinship, and blood brotherhood next to locally specific forms. Besides the function of establishing alliances even across class, ethnic, or religious boundaries, and an astonishing flexibility in adapting to specific interests and cultural contexts, the potential to render power for fictive and ritual kin became evident. Schneider's critique of the anthropology of kinship leads the way both to study fictive and ritual kinship in its own right and to chance a unified analysis of kinship that recognizes the significance that the people themselves attribute to such ties.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Kinship relationships beyond descent and affinity are commonly defined as ritual and fictive kinship. In a context of general empirical and theoretical neglect, the importance of ritual and fictive kinship for the study of society and power has been shown in research on its classical examples of godparenthood, fosterage, adoption, milk kinship, and blood brotherhood next to locally specific forms. Besides the function of establishing alliances even across class, ethnic, or religious boundaries, and an astonishing flexibility in adapting to specific interests and cultural contexts, the potential to render power for fictive and ritual kin became evident. Schneider's critique of the anthropology of kinship leads the way both to study fictive and ritual kinship in its own right and to chance a unified analysis of kinship that recognizes the significance that the people themselves attribute to such ties.

Key concepts: Kinship, Fictive kinship, Context (archaeology), Sociology, Genealogy, Power (physics), Anthropology, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ritual and Fictive Kinship — Research Paper | ScholarLens