2020International journal of scientific researchRequires access

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THREE ANESTHETIC GELS IN REDUCING PAIN DURING ADMINISTRATION OF LOCAL ANESTHESIA. – A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL TRIAL

Piyush H Kalsariya, Ruchi Arora, Pallavi P Jhawar, Juhi P Mehta

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To assess and compare the efficacy of different topical anesthetic agents on needle insertion pain during administration of IANB. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The study included 90 children of age 4 to 8 years which were divided into three groups: Group-A (20% benzocaine), Group-B (5% lidocaine) and Group-C (2% lignocaine). Topical anesthetic gel was applied prior to administration of IANB. After that 1.2ml of local anesthetic agent was administered. The response of child was constantly observed during administration of LA. Each participant was advised to choose emoticon that quantify the pain perception using modified Wong Beker pain rating scale. The ratings were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Results showed highly significant difference between the topical anesthetic effectiveness of all the groups. The topical anesthetic effectiveness on needle insertion pain of 20% Benzocaine is highest followed by 5% Lidocaine and 2% Lignocaine.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To assess and compare the efficacy of different topical anesthetic agents on needle insertion pain during administration of IANB. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The study included 90 children of age 4 to 8 years which were divided into three groups: Group-A (20% benzocaine), Group-B (5% lidocaine) and Group-C (2% lignocaine). Topical anesthetic gel was applied prior to administration of IANB. After that 1.2ml of local anesthetic agent was administered. The response of child was constantly observed during administration of LA. Each participant was advised to choose emoticon that quantify the pain perception using modified Wong Beker pain rating scale. The ratings were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Results showed highly significant difference between the topical anesthetic effectiveness of all the groups. The topical anesthetic effectiveness on needle insertion pain of 20% Benzocaine is highest followed by 5% Lidocaine and 2% Lignocaine.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To assess and compare the efficacy of different topical anesthetic agents on needle insertion pain during administration of IANB. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The study included 90 children of age 4 to 8 years which were divided into three groups: Group-A (20% benzocaine), Group-B (5% lidocaine) and Group-C (2% lignocaine). Topical anesthetic gel was applied prior to administration of IANB. After that 1.2ml of local anesthetic agent was administered. The response of child was constantly observed during administration of LA. Each participant was advised to choose emoticon that quantify the pain perception using modified Wong Beker pain rating scale. The ratings were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Results showed highly significant difference between the topical anesthetic effectiveness of all the groups. The topical anesthetic effectiveness on needle insertion pain of 20% Benzocaine is highest followed by 5% Lidocaine and 2% Lignocaine.

Key concepts: Benzocaine, Topical anesthetic, Lidocaine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Anesthetic, Local anesthetic, Anesthetic Agent

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THREE ANESTHETIC GELS IN REDUCING PAIN DURING ADMINISTRATION OF LOCAL ANESTHESIA. – A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL TRIAL — Research Paper | ScholarLens