2020Clinical & Translational ImmunologyOpen access

Distinct macrophage phenotypes skewed by local granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) and macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) are associated with tissue destruction and intimal hyperplasia in giant cell arteritis

William F. Jiemy, Yannick van Sleen, Kornelis S. M. van der Geest, Hilde A ten Berge, Wayel H. Abdulahad, Maria Sandovici, Annemieke MH Boots, Peter Heeringa, Elisabeth Brouwer

Open full text 71 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective To determine the presence and spatial distribution of different macrophage phenotypes, governed by granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) and macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) skewing signals, in giant cell arteritis (GCA) lesions. Methods Temporal artery biopsies (TABs, n = 11) from treatment‐naive GCA patients, aorta samples from GCA‐related aneurysms (n = 10) and atherosclerosis (n = 10) were stained by immunohistochemistry targeting selected macrophage phenotypic markers, cytokines, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and growth factors. In vitro macrophage differentiation (n = 10) followed by flow cytometry, Luminex assay and ELISA were performed to assess whether GM‐CSF and M‐CSF are drivers of macrophage phenotypic heterogeneity. Results A distinct spatial distribution pattern of macrophage phenotypes in TABs was identified. CD206+/MMP‐9+ macrophages were located at the site of tissue destruction, whereas FRβ+ macrophages were located in the inner intima of arteries with high degrees of intimal hyperplasia. Notably, this pattern was also observed in macrophage‐rich areas in GCA aortas but not in atherosclerotic aortas. Flow cytometry showed that GM‐CSF treatment highly upregulated CD206 expression, while FRβ was expressed by M‐CSF‐skewed macrophages, only. Furthermore, localised expression of GM‐CSF and M‐CSF was detected, likely contributing to macrophage heterogeneity in the vascular wall. Conclusions Our data document a distinct spatial distribution pattern of CD206+/MMP‐9+ macrophages and FRβ+ macrophages in GCA linked to tissue destruction and intimal proliferation, respectively. We suggest that these distinct macrophage phenotypes are skewed by sequential GM‐CSF and M‐CSF signals. Our study adds to a better understanding of the development and functional role of macrophage phenotypes in the pathogenesis of GCA and opens opportunities for the design of macrophage‐targeted therapies.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Objective To determine the presence and spatial distribution of different macrophage phenotypes, governed by granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) and macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) skewing signals, in giant cell arteritis (GCA) lesions. Methods Temporal artery biopsies (TABs, n = 11) from treatment‐naive GCA patients, aorta samples from GCA‐related aneurysms (n = 10) and atherosclerosis (n = 10) were stained by immunohistochemistry targeting selected macrophage phenotypic markers, cytokines, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and growth factors. In vitro macrophage differentiation (n = 10) followed by flow cytometry, Luminex assay and ELISA were performed to assess whether GM‐CSF and M‐CSF are drivers of macrophage phenotypic heterogeneity. Results A distinct spatial distribution pattern of macrophage phenotypes in TABs was identified. CD206+/MMP‐9+ macrophages were located at the site of tissue destruction, whereas FRβ+ macrophages were located in the inner intima of arteries with high degrees of intimal hyperplasia. Notably, this pattern was also observed in macrophage‐rich areas in GCA aortas but not in atherosclerotic aortas. Flow cytometry showed that GM‐CSF treatment highly upregulated CD206 expression, while FRβ was expressed by M‐CSF‐skewed macrophages, only. Furthermore, localised expression of GM‐CSF and M‐CSF was detected, likely contributing to macrophage heterogeneity in the vascular wall. Conclusions Our data document a distinct spatial distribution pattern of CD206+/MMP‐9+ macrophages and FRβ+ macrophages in GCA linked to tissue destruction and intimal proliferation, respectively. We suggest that these distinct macrophage phenotypes are skewed by sequential GM‐CSF and M‐CSF signals. Our study adds to a better understanding of the development and functional role of macrophage phenotypes in the pathogenesis of GCA and opens opportunities for the design of macrophage‐targeted therapies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 71 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Objective To determine the presence and spatial distribution of different macrophage phenotypes, governed by granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) and macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) skewing signals, in giant cell arteritis (GCA) lesions. Methods Temporal artery biopsies (TABs, n = 11) from treatment‐naive GCA patients, aorta samples from GCA‐related aneurysms (n = 10) and atherosclerosis (n = 10) were stained by immunohistochemistry targeting selected macrophage phenotypic markers, cytokines, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and growth factors. In vitro macrophage differentiation (n = 10) followed by flow cytometry, Luminex assay and ELISA were performed to assess whether GM‐CSF and M‐CSF are drivers of macrophage phenotypic heterogeneity. Results A distinct spatial distribution pattern of macrophage phenotypes in TABs was identified. CD206+/MMP‐9+ macrophages were located at the site of tissue destruction, whereas FRβ+ macrophages were located in the inner intima of arteries with high degrees of intimal hyperplasia. Notably, this pattern was also observed in macrophage‐rich areas in GCA aortas but not in atherosclerotic aortas. Flow cytometry showed that GM‐CSF treatment highly upregulated CD206 expression, while FRβ was expressed by M‐CSF‐skewed macrophages, only. Furthermore, localised expression of GM‐CSF and M‐CSF was detected, likely contributing to macrophage heterogeneity in the vascular wall. Conclusions Our data document a distinct spatial distribution pattern of CD206+/MMP‐9+ macrophages and FRβ+ macrophages in GCA linked to tissue destruction and intimal proliferation, respectively. We suggest that these distinct macrophage phenotypes are skewed by sequential GM‐CSF and M‐CSF signals. Our study adds to a better understanding of the development and functional role of macrophage phenotypes in the pathogenesis of GCA and opens opportunities for the design of macrophage‐targeted therapies.

Key concepts: Macrophage, Macrophage colony-stimulating factor, Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, Pathology, Biology, M2 Macrophage, Flow cytometry, Immunology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Distinct macrophage phenotypes skewed by local granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) and macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) are associated with tissue destruction and intimal hyperplasia in giant cell arteritis — Research Paper | ScholarLens