2020TransplantationRequires access

Major Thromboembolic Complications in Liver Transplantation: The Role of Rotational Thromboelastometry and Cryoprecipitate Transfusion

Christine Nguyen, Wei Gao, Vatche G. Agopian, Christopher Wray, Randolph H. Steadman, Victor W. Xia

Open publisher page 32 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although hemorrhage is a major concern during liver transplantation (LT), the risk for thromboembolism is well recognized. Implementation of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) has been associated with the increased use of cryoprecipitate; however, the role of ROTEM-guided transfusion strategy and cryoprecipitate administration in the development of major thromboembolic complications (MTCs) has never been documented. METHODS: We conducted a study on patients undergoing LT before and after the implementation of ROTEM. We defined MTC as intracardiac thrombus, pulmonary embolism, hepatic artery thrombosis, and ischemic stroke in 30 d after LT. We used a propensity score to match patients during the 2 study periods. RESULTS: Among 2330 patients, 119 (4.9%) developed MTC. The implementation of ROTEM was significantly associated with an increase in cryoprecipitate use (1.1 ± 1.1 versus 2.9 ± 2.3 units, P < 0.001) and MTC (4.2% versus 9.5%, P < 0.001). Further analysis demonstrated that the use of cryoprecipitate was an independent risk factor for MTC (odds ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.24, P = 0.003). Patients with MTC had significantly lower 1-y survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the implementation of ROTEM and the use of cryoprecipitate play significant roles in the development of MTC in LT. The benefits and risks of cryoprecipitate transfusion should be carefully evaluated before administration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Although hemorrhage is a major concern during liver transplantation (LT), the risk for thromboembolism is well recognized. Implementation of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) has been associated with the increased use of cryoprecipitate; however, the role of ROTEM-guided transfusion strategy and cryoprecipitate administration in the development of major thromboembolic complications (MTCs) has never been documented. METHODS: We conducted a study on patients undergoing LT before and after the implementation of ROTEM. We defined MTC as intracardiac thrombus, pulmonary embolism, hepatic artery thrombosis, and ischemic stroke in 30 d after LT. We used a propensity score to match patients during the 2 study periods. RESULTS: Among 2330 patients, 119 (4.9%) developed MTC. The implementation of ROTEM was significantly associated with an increase in cryoprecipitate use (1.1 ± 1.1 versus 2.9 ± 2.3 units, P < 0.001) and MTC (4.2% versus 9.5%, P < 0.001). Further analysis demonstrated that the use of cryoprecipitate was an independent risk factor for MTC (odds ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.24, P = 0.003). Patients with MTC had significantly lower 1-y survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the implementation of ROTEM and the use of cryoprecipitate play significant roles in the development of MTC in LT. The benefits and risks of cryoprecipitate transfusion should be carefully evaluated before administration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Although hemorrhage is a major concern during liver transplantation (LT), the risk for thromboembolism is well recognized. Implementation of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) has been associated with the increased use of cryoprecipitate; however, the role of ROTEM-guided transfusion strategy and cryoprecipitate administration in the development of major thromboembolic complications (MTCs) has never been documented. METHODS: We conducted a study on patients undergoing LT before and after the implementation of ROTEM. We defined MTC as intracardiac thrombus, pulmonary embolism, hepatic artery thrombosis, and ischemic stroke in 30 d after LT. We used a propensity score to match patients during the 2 study periods. RESULTS: Among 2330 patients, 119 (4.9%) developed MTC. The implementation of ROTEM was significantly associated with an increase in cryoprecipitate use (1.1 ± 1.1 versus 2.9 ± 2.3 units, P < 0.001) and MTC (4.2% versus 9.5%, P < 0.001). Further analysis demonstrated that the use of cryoprecipitate was an independent risk factor for MTC (odds ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.24, P = 0.003). Patients with MTC had significantly lower 1-y survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the implementation of ROTEM and the use of cryoprecipitate play significant roles in the development of MTC in LT. The benefits and risks of cryoprecipitate transfusion should be carefully evaluated before administration.

Key concepts: Cryoprecipitate, Medicine, Thromboelastometry, Liver transplantation, Odds ratio, Confidence interval, Prothrombin complex concentrate, Transplantation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Major Thromboembolic Complications in Liver Transplantation: The Role of Rotational Thromboelastometry and Cryoprecipitate Transfusion — Research Paper | ScholarLens