2020American Journal of Enology and ViticultureRequires access

Evaluation of Ripening Indicators for Harvest-time Decision Making in Cold Climate Grape Production

Jacob Scharfetter, Andi Nelson, Beth Ann Workmaster, Amaya Atucha

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Currently, growers and winemakers of cold climate interspecific hybrid grape (CCIHG) cultivars rely solely on the technological maturity variables Brix, titratable acidity (TA), and pH as ripening indicators for harvest and winemaking decisions. In contrast, using additional chemical variables to determine optimal harvest times is a common practice in most regions of the world where the European grape Vitis vinifera is cultivated. As there are significant differences in berry chemistry between CCIHG and V. vinifera, the objective of the present study was to evaluate, by linear regression coupled with principal component analysis and cluster analysis, the suitability of six additional maturity variables (berry fresh weight, total protein, total phenolics, monomeric anthocyanins, percent polymeric color, and total tannins) as potential ripening indicators for the CCIHG cultivars Brianna, Frontenac, La Crescent, Léon Millot, Maréchal Foch, Marquette, MN 1220, and Petite Pearl. We observed that berry fresh weight, total phenolics, and percent polymeric color had inconsistent and difficult-to-model relationships from year to year and across distinct grape cluster microclimate treatments, making them unsuitable as ripening indicators. In addition to the standard technological maturity variables of Brix, TA, and pH, the variables of total protein concentration for white cultivars and of monomeric anthocyanin, total protein, and total tannin concentrations for red cultivars have consistent linear relationships from veraison to harvest, making them good candidates for ripening indicators.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Currently, growers and winemakers of cold climate interspecific hybrid grape (CCIHG) cultivars rely solely on the technological maturity variables Brix, titratable acidity (TA), and pH as ripening indicators for harvest and winemaking decisions. In contrast, using additional chemical variables to determine optimal harvest times is a common practice in most regions of the world where the European grape Vitis vinifera is cultivated. As there are significant differences in berry chemistry between CCIHG and V. vinifera, the objective of the present study was to evaluate, by linear regression coupled with principal component analysis and cluster analysis, the suitability of six additional maturity variables (berry fresh weight, total protein, total phenolics, monomeric anthocyanins, percent polymeric color, and total tannins) as potential ripening indicators for the CCIHG cultivars Brianna, Frontenac, La Crescent, Léon Millot, Maréchal Foch, Marquette, MN 1220, and Petite Pearl. We observed that berry fresh weight, total phenolics, and percent polymeric color had inconsistent and difficult-to-model relationships from year to year and across distinct grape cluster microclimate treatments, making them unsuitable as ripening indicators. In addition to the standard technological maturity variables of Brix, TA, and pH, the variables of total protein concentration for white cultivars and of monomeric anthocyanin, total protein, and total tannin concentrations for red cultivars have consistent linear relationships from veraison to harvest, making them good candidates for ripening indicators.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Currently, growers and winemakers of cold climate interspecific hybrid grape (CCIHG) cultivars rely solely on the technological maturity variables Brix, titratable acidity (TA), and pH as ripening indicators for harvest and winemaking decisions. In contrast, using additional chemical variables to determine optimal harvest times is a common practice in most regions of the world where the European grape Vitis vinifera is cultivated. As there are significant differences in berry chemistry between CCIHG and V. vinifera, the objective of the present study was to evaluate, by linear regression coupled with principal component analysis and cluster analysis, the suitability of six additional maturity variables (berry fresh weight, total protein, total phenolics, monomeric anthocyanins, percent polymeric color, and total tannins) as potential ripening indicators for the CCIHG cultivars Brianna, Frontenac, La Crescent, Léon Millot, Maréchal Foch, Marquette, MN 1220, and Petite Pearl. We observed that berry fresh weight, total phenolics, and percent polymeric color had inconsistent and difficult-to-model relationships from year to year and across distinct grape cluster microclimate treatments, making them unsuitable as ripening indicators. In addition to the standard technological maturity variables of Brix, TA, and pH, the variables of total protein concentration for white cultivars and of monomeric anthocyanin, total protein, and total tannin concentrations for red cultivars have consistent linear relationships from veraison to harvest, making them good candidates for ripening indicators.

Key concepts: Ripening, Production (economics), Horticulture, Biology, Economics, Macroeconomics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Ripening Indicators for Harvest-time Decision Making in Cold Climate Grape Production — Research Paper | ScholarLens