2010CABI eBooksRequires access

Improving rice productivity in the coastal saline soils of the Mahanadi Delta of India through integrated nutrient management.

K. R. Mahata, Dhananjay Singh, Soumya Saha, A. M. Ismail, Stephan M. Haefele

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The coastal saline belt of the Mahanadi Delta in Orissa, India, is mostly monocropped with rainfed rice during the wet season (WS). In the dry season (DS), a small area is planted to rice using harvested rainwater. Currently, yields are low; however, integrated nutrient management combined with improved salt-tolerant rice varieties could increase system productivity substantially. On-farm trials were conducted in the Ersama block of Jagatsinghpur district (Orissa) using rice varieties Pankaj (shallow lowland) and Lunishree (intermediate lowland) in the wet season and Annapurna and Canning 7 in the dry season. Selected nutrient management practices were evaluated during 2004-2006 and the most promising options were validated in participatory farmer-managed trials in 2006-2007 conducted at six to eight locations. In the shallow lowlands, Sesbania green manuring (GM)+prilled urea (PU; 20 kg/ha N), Azolla+PU (30 kg/ha N) and Sesbania+Azolla were as effective as PU at 60 kg/ha N, in both the 2004 and 2005 WS, with a yield advantage of 30-40%. In the intermediate lowlands, the grain yields with Sesbania in 2004 and farmyard manure (FYM; 5.0 t/ha)+PU (20 kg/ha N) in 2005 were comparable with the yield achieved with urea supergranules (USG; 45 kg/ha N), which had limited scope because of unavailability and placement problems. The yield advantage of these treatments was 23-68%. During the DS of 2005 and 2006, Azolla+PU (50 kg/ha N) resulted in significantly higher yields (15%) than the application of PU at 80 kg/ha N. In demonstration trials at six on-farm sites in the 2006 WS, Sesbania and Sesbania+Azolla increased rice yields in the shallow lowlands by 12-40% (mean 23%) and 19-77% (mean 41%), respectively. In the same season, the yield advantage due to Sesbania was 8-50% (mean 29%) for eight on-farm sites in intermediate lowlands. In the 2007 DS, Azolla increased rice yield by 16-35% (mean 24%) over a control treatment at eight onfarm sites. These findings suggest that, under both the shallow and intermediate lowlands, Sesbania for the WS and Azolla biofertilizer for the DS are promising organic nutrient sources that can improve soil quality and contribute to enhancing and sustaining crop productivity in coastal areas.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The coastal saline belt of the Mahanadi Delta in Orissa, India, is mostly monocropped with rainfed rice during the wet season (WS). In the dry season (DS), a small area is planted to rice using harvested rainwater. Currently, yields are low; however, integrated nutrient management combined with improved salt-tolerant rice varieties could increase system productivity substantially. On-farm trials were conducted in the Ersama block of Jagatsinghpur district (Orissa) using rice varieties Pankaj (shallow lowland) and Lunishree (intermediate lowland) in the wet season and Annapurna and Canning 7 in the dry season. Selected nutrient management practices were evaluated during 2004-2006 and the most promising options were validated in participatory farmer-managed trials in 2006-2007 conducted at six to eight locations. In the shallow lowlands, Sesbania green manuring (GM)+prilled urea (PU; 20 kg/ha N), Azolla+PU (30 kg/ha N) and Sesbania+Azolla were as effective as PU at 60 kg/ha N, in both the 2004 and 2005 WS, with a yield advantage of 30-40%. In the intermediate lowlands, the grain yields with Sesbania in 2004 and farmyard manure (FYM; 5.0 t/ha)+PU (20 kg/ha N) in 2005 were comparable with the yield achieved with urea supergranules (USG; 45 kg/ha N), which had limited scope because of unavailability and placement problems. The yield advantage of these treatments was 23-68%. During the DS of 2005 and 2006, Azolla+PU (50 kg/ha N) resulted in significantly higher yields (15%) than the application of PU at 80 kg/ha N. In demonstration trials at six on-farm sites in the 2006 WS, Sesbania and Sesbania+Azolla increased rice yields in the shallow lowlands by 12-40% (mean 23%) and 19-77% (mean 41%), respectively. In the same season, the yield advantage due to Sesbania was 8-50% (mean 29%) for eight on-farm sites in intermediate lowlands. In the 2007 DS, Azolla increased rice yield by 16-35% (mean 24%) over a control treatment at eight onfarm sites. These findings suggest that, under both the shallow and intermediate lowlands, Sesbania for the WS and Azolla biofertilizer for the DS are promising organic nutrient sources that can improve soil quality and contribute to enhancing and sustaining crop productivity in coastal areas.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The coastal saline belt of the Mahanadi Delta in Orissa, India, is mostly monocropped with rainfed rice during the wet season (WS). In the dry season (DS), a small area is planted to rice using harvested rainwater. Currently, yields are low; however, integrated nutrient management combined with improved salt-tolerant rice varieties could increase system productivity substantially. On-farm trials were conducted in the Ersama block of Jagatsinghpur district (Orissa) using rice varieties Pankaj (shallow lowland) and Lunishree (intermediate lowland) in the wet season and Annapurna and Canning 7 in the dry season. Selected nutrient management practices were evaluated during 2004-2006 and the most promising options were validated in participatory farmer-managed trials in 2006-2007 conducted at six to eight locations. In the shallow lowlands, Sesbania green manuring (GM)+prilled urea (PU; 20 kg/ha N), Azolla+PU (30 kg/ha N) and Sesbania+Azolla were as effective as PU at 60 kg/ha N, in both the 2004 and 2005 WS, with a yield advantage of 30-40%. In the intermediate lowlands, the grain yields with Sesbania in 2004 and farmyard manure (FYM; 5.0 t/ha)+PU (20 kg/ha N) in 2005 were comparable with the yield achieved with urea supergranules (USG; 45 kg/ha N), which had limited scope because of unavailability and placement problems. The yield advantage of these treatments was 23-68%. During the DS of 2005 and 2006, Azolla+PU (50 kg/ha N) resulted in significantly higher yields (15%) than the application of PU at 80 kg/ha N. In demonstration trials at six on-farm sites in the 2006 WS, Sesbania and Sesbania+Azolla increased rice yields in the shallow lowlands by 12-40% (mean 23%) and 19-77% (mean 41%), respectively. In the same season, the yield advantage due to Sesbania was 8-50% (mean 29%) for eight on-farm sites in intermediate lowlands. In the 2007 DS, Azolla increased rice yield by 16-35% (mean 24%) over a control treatment at eight onfarm sites. These findings suggest that, under both the shallow and intermediate lowlands, Sesbania for the WS and Azolla biofertilizer for the DS are promising organic nutrient sources that can improve soil quality and contribute to enhancing and sustaining crop productivity in coastal areas.

Key concepts: Sesbania, Nutrient management, Dry season, Azolla, Agronomy, Wet season, Nutrient, Green manure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Improving rice productivity in the coastal saline soils of the Mahanadi Delta of India through integrated nutrient management. — Research Paper | ScholarLens