2006CABI eBooksRequires access

The effects of domestic agricultural reforms and market access on trade and production in less developed countries.

Shawn Robinson, Karen Thierfelder

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter analyses the impact of OECD policies, particularly US farm programmes, on the developing countries. It separately considers: (i) the impact of OECD domestic support programmes on world markets through their impact on OECD agricultural exports; and (ii) OECD protection of agricultural markets that affect potential agricultural exports of developing countries. The analysis considers four scenarios. First, it considers the effects of unilateral reform in the USA - this eliminates all domestic agricultural support and liberalizes agricultural trade. It then considers the effects of domestic support alone by removing domestic agricultural support in OECD countries. Third, OECD countries remove domestic support for agriculture and liberalizes trade in agriculture. Finally, the analysis considers complete liberalization in agriculture - eliminating all OECD domestic support and all countries liberalize trade in agriculture. The empirical work leads to the following conclusions: (1) eliminating only domestic programmes in OECD countries, without any change in trade policies, has little impact on trade with developing countries; (2) adding agricultural trade liberalization in the OECD countries to domestic policy liberalization in agriculture has considerable effects on trade; (3) agricultural trade among developing countries faces more protection than trade between developing countries and the OECD countries, but the trade volumes are lower; and (4) unilateral agricultural policy reform by either the USA or the EU is difficult, with the non-reforming region gaining market share and with serious impacts on farm incomes in the reforming region.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter analyses the impact of OECD policies, particularly US farm programmes, on the developing countries. It separately considers: (i) the impact of OECD domestic support programmes on world markets through their impact on OECD agricultural exports; and (ii) OECD protection of agricultural markets that affect potential agricultural exports of developing countries. The analysis considers four scenarios. First, it considers the effects of unilateral reform in the USA - this eliminates all domestic agricultural support and liberalizes agricultural trade. It then considers the effects of domestic support alone by removing domestic agricultural support in OECD countries. Third, OECD countries remove domestic support for agriculture and liberalizes trade in agriculture. Finally, the analysis considers complete liberalization in agriculture - eliminating all OECD domestic support and all countries liberalize trade in agriculture. The empirical work leads to the following conclusions: (1) eliminating only domestic programmes in OECD countries, without any change in trade policies, has little impact on trade with developing countries; (2) adding agricultural trade liberalization in the OECD countries to domestic policy liberalization in agriculture has considerable effects on trade; (3) agricultural trade among developing countries faces more protection than trade between developing countries and the OECD countries, but the trade volumes are lower; and (4) unilateral agricultural policy reform by either the USA or the EU is difficult, with the non-reforming region gaining market share and with serious impacts on farm incomes in the reforming region.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter analyses the impact of OECD policies, particularly US farm programmes, on the developing countries. It separately considers: (i) the impact of OECD domestic support programmes on world markets through their impact on OECD agricultural exports; and (ii) OECD protection of agricultural markets that affect potential agricultural exports of developing countries. The analysis considers four scenarios. First, it considers the effects of unilateral reform in the USA - this eliminates all domestic agricultural support and liberalizes agricultural trade. It then considers the effects of domestic support alone by removing domestic agricultural support in OECD countries. Third, OECD countries remove domestic support for agriculture and liberalizes trade in agriculture. Finally, the analysis considers complete liberalization in agriculture - eliminating all OECD domestic support and all countries liberalize trade in agriculture. The empirical work leads to the following conclusions: (1) eliminating only domestic programmes in OECD countries, without any change in trade policies, has little impact on trade with developing countries; (2) adding agricultural trade liberalization in the OECD countries to domestic policy liberalization in agriculture has considerable effects on trade; (3) agricultural trade among developing countries faces more protection than trade between developing countries and the OECD countries, but the trade volumes are lower; and (4) unilateral agricultural policy reform by either the USA or the EU is difficult, with the non-reforming region gaining market share and with serious impacts on farm incomes in the reforming region.

Key concepts: Agriculture, Free trade, International economics, Liberalization, International trade, Developing country, Trade barrier, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effects of domestic agricultural reforms and market access on trade and production in less developed countries. — Research Paper | ScholarLens