2013PubMedRequires access

[Evaluations of urinary sediment and dry chemical detection in urinary tract infections].

Jie Zhu, Ai-rong Niu, Zi-yun Zhao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic values of urinalysis in urinary tract infections. METHODS: A total of 526 urine culture specimens were analyzed by UF-1000i urine analyzers and GEB600 urine chemistry analyzer to determine the sensitivity and specificity of individual and combined analysis of white blood cell, bacteria count and nitrite test in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections. And bacterial culture was used as the gold standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rate of bacterial count were the highest in individual analysis at 84.3%, 90.5%, 84.3%, 90.5% and 88.2% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy of combined bacterial count and leukocyte was 83.9%, 91.0%, 85.4% and 88.2% respectively while the negative predictive value of white blood cell and nitrite was highest (91.3%). Compared with the combined or single analysis, the combination of three analyses had the highest sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rate at 85.4%, 92.6%, 84.7%, 93.0%, 90.3% respectively. CONCLUSION: The combined urinalysis may be used as a rapid screening indicator of urinary tract infections.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic values of urinalysis in urinary tract infections. METHODS: A total of 526 urine culture specimens were analyzed by UF-1000i urine analyzers and GEB600 urine chemistry analyzer to determine the sensitivity and specificity of individual and combined analysis of white blood cell, bacteria count and nitrite test in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections. And bacterial culture was used as the gold standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rate of bacterial count were the highest in individual analysis at 84.3%, 90.5%, 84.3%, 90.5% and 88.2% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy of combined bacterial count and leukocyte was 83.9%, 91.0%, 85.4% and 88.2% respectively while the negative predictive value of white blood cell and nitrite was highest (91.3%). Compared with the combined or single analysis, the combination of three analyses had the highest sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rate at 85.4%, 92.6%, 84.7%, 93.0%, 90.3% respectively. CONCLUSION: The combined urinalysis may be used as a rapid screening indicator of urinary tract infections.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic values of urinalysis in urinary tract infections. METHODS: A total of 526 urine culture specimens were analyzed by UF-1000i urine analyzers and GEB600 urine chemistry analyzer to determine the sensitivity and specificity of individual and combined analysis of white blood cell, bacteria count and nitrite test in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections. And bacterial culture was used as the gold standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rate of bacterial count were the highest in individual analysis at 84.3%, 90.5%, 84.3%, 90.5% and 88.2% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy of combined bacterial count and leukocyte was 83.9%, 91.0%, 85.4% and 88.2% respectively while the negative predictive value of white blood cell and nitrite was highest (91.3%). Compared with the combined or single analysis, the combination of three analyses had the highest sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rate at 85.4%, 92.6%, 84.7%, 93.0%, 90.3% respectively. CONCLUSION: The combined urinalysis may be used as a rapid screening indicator of urinary tract infections.

Key concepts: Urinalysis, Urine, Urinary system, Predictive value, Urinary sediment, Gold standard (test), White blood cell, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Evaluations of urinary sediment and dry chemical detection in urinary tract infections]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens