2020International Journal of Pathogen ResearchOpen access

Evaluation of the Correlation between Biofilm Formation and Drug Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii

Berrin Çelik

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to determine correlation between biofilm formation and drug resistance in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Study Design: Bacteriological study. Place and Duration of Study: Laboratory of Microbiology of BilecikSeyhEdebali University, in Turkey, between April 2019 and November 2019. Methodology: Antibiotic susceptibility of the strains were determined using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method in accordance with the principles of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Biofilm presence in A. baumanniiwas identified by the quantitative method. the isolates were incubated in nutrient agar and was prepared from fresh cultures in tubes containing glucose-Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. The A. baumannii(ATCC 19606) type strain was used for comparisons. Results: In this study was determined the relationship between the biofilm production capacity of the A. baumanniibacteria and its antimicrobial resistance. According to the results obtained from our study, the highest resistance rate (%) was found ceftazidime and piperacillin (95 %) while the highest sensitivity was found colistin (96.6 %) and tigecycline (86.6 %) of the total 60 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. In addition, the presence of biofilm in the bacteria was defined by quantitative method using microplate. In this study, biofilm was positive in 54 (90 %) isolates and it has been found 51 (85%) of the biofilm positive isolates to be resistant to piperacillin, ceftazidime, cefotaxime and meropenem. Conclusion: As a result, there is a positive relationship between biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance in thesebacteria.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aims: The aim of this study was to determine correlation between biofilm formation and drug resistance in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Study Design: Bacteriological study. Place and Duration of Study: Laboratory of Microbiology of BilecikSeyhEdebali University, in Turkey, between April 2019 and November 2019. Methodology: Antibiotic susceptibility of the strains were determined using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method in accordance with the principles of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Biofilm presence in A. baumanniiwas identified by the quantitative method. the isolates were incubated in nutrient agar and was prepared from fresh cultures in tubes containing glucose-Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. The A. baumannii(ATCC 19606) type strain was used for comparisons. Results: In this study was determined the relationship between the biofilm production capacity of the A. baumanniibacteria and its antimicrobial resistance. According to the results obtained from our study, the highest resistance rate (%) was found ceftazidime and piperacillin (95 %) while the highest sensitivity was found colistin (96.6 %) and tigecycline (86.6 %) of the total 60 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. In addition, the presence of biofilm in the bacteria was defined by quantitative method using microplate. In this study, biofilm was positive in 54 (90 %) isolates and it has been found 51 (85%) of the biofilm positive isolates to be resistant to piperacillin, ceftazidime, cefotaxime and meropenem. Conclusion: As a result, there is a positive relationship between biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance in thesebacteria.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to determine correlation between biofilm formation and drug resistance in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Study Design: Bacteriological study. Place and Duration of Study: Laboratory of Microbiology of BilecikSeyhEdebali University, in Turkey, between April 2019 and November 2019. Methodology: Antibiotic susceptibility of the strains were determined using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method in accordance with the principles of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Biofilm presence in A. baumanniiwas identified by the quantitative method. the isolates were incubated in nutrient agar and was prepared from fresh cultures in tubes containing glucose-Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. The A. baumannii(ATCC 19606) type strain was used for comparisons. Results: In this study was determined the relationship between the biofilm production capacity of the A. baumanniibacteria and its antimicrobial resistance. According to the results obtained from our study, the highest resistance rate (%) was found ceftazidime and piperacillin (95 %) while the highest sensitivity was found colistin (96.6 %) and tigecycline (86.6 %) of the total 60 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. In addition, the presence of biofilm in the bacteria was defined by quantitative method using microplate. In this study, biofilm was positive in 54 (90 %) isolates and it has been found 51 (85%) of the biofilm positive isolates to be resistant to piperacillin, ceftazidime, cefotaxime and meropenem. Conclusion: As a result, there is a positive relationship between biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance in thesebacteria.

Key concepts: Acinetobacter baumannii, Microbiology, Ceftazidime, Piperacillin, Biofilm, Colistin, Cefotaxime, Tigecycline

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of the Correlation between Biofilm Formation and Drug Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii — Research Paper | ScholarLens