Consortium for National Space Resources Access (CNSA)
Meiditomo Sutyarjoko, Yuliawan Cahya Pamungkas
Abstract
Meiditomo Sutyarjoko, Yuliawan Cahya Pamungkas
Abstract
Space technology development history goes way back to the World War II era fueled by the “space race”. Indonesia is one of the early adopter of GEO satellite communication technology, and remain largely as satellite operator – albeit of the national program to master the space technology. Mastering space technology is not an easy task, and so far India is the only developing country that able to reach the rank #13 in the Space Technology Ladder. The space technology conservatism, particularly in the GEO satellite technology, that discourage innovations has been seen shifted due to recent structural industry change. The non-GSO satellite seems to lead the Disruptive Satellite Technology (DST) and has been self evidence on the start ups advancement in satellite industry. Increase in leverage as satellite operators, proposed to be achieved through the CNSA model should lead to a better rounded satellite coordination orchestration and more benefit for the satellite procurement processes. Aggregation of the satellite procurement processes, should benefit the procurement investment amount, technology transfer in the forms of training, program offset, or increase in local content should be less challenging, and for satellite operators who are the member of the consortium may only procure the satellite capacity as needed in their business plan.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Space technology development history goes way back to the World War II era fueled by the “space race”. Indonesia is one of the early adopter of GEO satellite communication technology, and remain largely as satellite operator – albeit of the national program to master the space technology. Mastering space technology is not an easy task, and so far India is the only developing country that able to reach the rank #13 in the Space Technology Ladder. The space technology conservatism, particularly in the GEO satellite technology, that discourage innovations has been seen shifted due to recent structural industry change. The non-GSO satellite seems to lead the Disruptive Satellite Technology (DST) and has been self evidence on the start ups advancement in satellite industry. Increase in leverage as satellite operators, proposed to be achieved through the CNSA model should lead to a better rounded satellite coordination orchestration and more benefit for the satellite procurement processes. Aggregation of the satellite procurement processes, should benefit the procurement investment amount, technology transfer in the forms of training, program offset, or increase in local content should be less challenging, and for satellite operators who are the member of the consortium may only procure the satellite capacity as needed in their business plan.
Key concepts: Space industry, Space technology, Satellite, Space policy, Procurement, Business, Computer science, Telecommunications