2018•Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pusat Kajian Kebijakan Penerbangan dan Antariksa LAPANRequires access

Consortium for National Space Resources Access (CNSA)

Meiditomo Sutyarjoko, Yuliawan Cahya Pamungkas

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Space technology development history goes way back to the World War II era fueled by the “space race”. Indonesia is one of the early adopter of GEO satellite communication technology, and remain largely as satellite operator – albeit of the national program to master the space technology. Mastering space technology is not an easy task, and so far India is the only developing country that able to reach the rank #13 in the Space Technology Ladder. The space technology conservatism, particularly in the GEO satellite technology, that discourage innovations has been seen shifted due to recent structural industry change. The non-GSO satellite seems to lead the Disruptive Satellite Technology (DST) and has been self evidence on the start ups advancement in satellite industry. Increase in leverage as satellite operators, proposed to be achieved through the CNSA model should lead to a better rounded satellite coordination orchestration and more benefit for the satellite procurement processes. Aggregation of the satellite procurement processes, should benefit the procurement investment amount, technology transfer in the forms of training, program offset, or increase in local content should be less challenging, and for satellite operators who are the member of the consortium may only procure the satellite capacity as needed in their business plan.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Space technology development history goes way back to the World War II era fueled by the “space race”. Indonesia is one of the early adopter of GEO satellite communication technology, and remain largely as satellite operator – albeit of the national program to master the space technology. Mastering space technology is not an easy task, and so far India is the only developing country that able to reach the rank #13 in the Space Technology Ladder. The space technology conservatism, particularly in the GEO satellite technology, that discourage innovations has been seen shifted due to recent structural industry change. The non-GSO satellite seems to lead the Disruptive Satellite Technology (DST) and has been self evidence on the start ups advancement in satellite industry. Increase in leverage as satellite operators, proposed to be achieved through the CNSA model should lead to a better rounded satellite coordination orchestration and more benefit for the satellite procurement processes. Aggregation of the satellite procurement processes, should benefit the procurement investment amount, technology transfer in the forms of training, program offset, or increase in local content should be less challenging, and for satellite operators who are the member of the consortium may only procure the satellite capacity as needed in their business plan.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Space technology development history goes way back to the World War II era fueled by the “space race”. Indonesia is one of the early adopter of GEO satellite communication technology, and remain largely as satellite operator – albeit of the national program to master the space technology. Mastering space technology is not an easy task, and so far India is the only developing country that able to reach the rank #13 in the Space Technology Ladder. The space technology conservatism, particularly in the GEO satellite technology, that discourage innovations has been seen shifted due to recent structural industry change. The non-GSO satellite seems to lead the Disruptive Satellite Technology (DST) and has been self evidence on the start ups advancement in satellite industry. Increase in leverage as satellite operators, proposed to be achieved through the CNSA model should lead to a better rounded satellite coordination orchestration and more benefit for the satellite procurement processes. Aggregation of the satellite procurement processes, should benefit the procurement investment amount, technology transfer in the forms of training, program offset, or increase in local content should be less challenging, and for satellite operators who are the member of the consortium may only procure the satellite capacity as needed in their business plan.

Key concepts: Space industry, Space technology, Satellite, Space policy, Procurement, Business, Computer science, Telecommunications

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Consortium for National Space Resources Access (CNSA) — Research Paper | ScholarLens