Is it identity all the way down? From supersubstantivalism to composition as identity and back again
Michael Duncan, Kristie Miller
Abstract
Michael Duncan, Kristie Miller
Abstract
We argue that, insofar as one accepts either supersubstantivalism or strong composition as identity for the usual reasons, one has (defeasible) reasons to accept the other as well. Thus, all else being equal, one ought to find the package that combines both views – the Identity Package – more attractive than any rival package that includes one, but not the other, of either supersubstantivalism or composition as identity.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We argue that, insofar as one accepts either supersubstantivalism or strong composition as identity for the usual reasons, one has (defeasible) reasons to accept the other as well. Thus, all else being equal, one ought to find the package that combines both views – the Identity Package – more attractive than any rival package that includes one, but not the other, of either supersubstantivalism or composition as identity.
Key concepts: Identity (music), Composition (language), Defeasible estate, Epistemology, Sociology, Philosophy, Aesthetics, Linguistics