2020•Journal of Neurosciences in Rural PracticeOpen access

The Yield of Repeat Angiography in Angiography-Negative Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Ujwal Yeole, Madhusudhan Nagesh, Dhaval Prem Shukla, H. R. Aravind, Andiperumal Raj Prabhuraj

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective Despite the technological advancement in imaging, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains gold standard imaging modality for spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). But even after DSA, around 15% of SAH remains elusive for the cause of the bleed. This is an institutional review to solve the mystery, “when is second DSA really indicated?” Methods In a retrospective review from January 2015 to December 2017, we evaluated cases of spontaneous SAH with initial negative DSA with repeat DSA after 6 weeks to rule out vascular abnormality. The spontaneous SAH was confirmed on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) and divided into two groups of perimesencephalic SAH (PM-SAH) or nonperimesencephalic SAH (nPM-SAH). The outcome was assessed by a modified Rankin’s score (mRS) at 6 months postictus. Results During the study period, we had 119 cases of initial negative DSA and 98 cases (82.3%) underwent repeat DSA after 6 weeks interval. A total of 53 cases (54.1%) had PM-SAH and 45 cases (45.9%) had nPM-SAH. Repeat DSA after 6 weeks showed no vascular abnormality in 53 cases of PM-SAH and in 2 (4.4%) out of 45 cases of nPM-SAH. At 6 months postictus, all cases of PM-SAH and 93% of nPM-SAH had mRS of 0. Conclusion We recommend, a repeat DSA is definitely not required in PM-SAH, but it should be done for all cases of nPM-SAH, before labeling them as nonaneurysmal SAH. Although the overall outcome for nonaneurysmal spontaneous SAH is better than aneurysmal SAH, nPM-SAH has poorer eventual outcome compared to PM-SAH.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Objective Despite the technological advancement in imaging, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains gold standard imaging modality for spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). But even after DSA, around 15% of SAH remains elusive for the cause of the bleed. This is an institutional review to solve the mystery, “when is second DSA really indicated?” Methods In a retrospective review from January 2015 to December 2017, we evaluated cases of spontaneous SAH with initial negative DSA with repeat DSA after 6 weeks to rule out vascular abnormality. The spontaneous SAH was confirmed on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) and divided into two groups of perimesencephalic SAH (PM-SAH) or nonperimesencephalic SAH (nPM-SAH). The outcome was assessed by a modified Rankin’s score (mRS) at 6 months postictus. Results During the study period, we had 119 cases of initial negative DSA and 98 cases (82.3%) underwent repeat DSA after 6 weeks interval. A total of 53 cases (54.1%) had PM-SAH and 45 cases (45.9%) had nPM-SAH. Repeat DSA after 6 weeks showed no vascular abnormality in 53 cases of PM-SAH and in 2 (4.4%) out of 45 cases of nPM-SAH. At 6 months postictus, all cases of PM-SAH and 93% of nPM-SAH had mRS of 0. Conclusion We recommend, a repeat DSA is definitely not required in PM-SAH, but it should be done for all cases of nPM-SAH, before labeling them as nonaneurysmal SAH. Although the overall outcome for nonaneurysmal spontaneous SAH is better than aneurysmal SAH, nPM-SAH has poorer eventual outcome compared to PM-SAH.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Objective Despite the technological advancement in imaging, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains gold standard imaging modality for spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). But even after DSA, around 15% of SAH remains elusive for the cause of the bleed. This is an institutional review to solve the mystery, “when is second DSA really indicated?” Methods In a retrospective review from January 2015 to December 2017, we evaluated cases of spontaneous SAH with initial negative DSA with repeat DSA after 6 weeks to rule out vascular abnormality. The spontaneous SAH was confirmed on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) and divided into two groups of perimesencephalic SAH (PM-SAH) or nonperimesencephalic SAH (nPM-SAH). The outcome was assessed by a modified Rankin’s score (mRS) at 6 months postictus. Results During the study period, we had 119 cases of initial negative DSA and 98 cases (82.3%) underwent repeat DSA after 6 weeks interval. A total of 53 cases (54.1%) had PM-SAH and 45 cases (45.9%) had nPM-SAH. Repeat DSA after 6 weeks showed no vascular abnormality in 53 cases of PM-SAH and in 2 (4.4%) out of 45 cases of nPM-SAH. At 6 months postictus, all cases of PM-SAH and 93% of nPM-SAH had mRS of 0. Conclusion We recommend, a repeat DSA is definitely not required in PM-SAH, but it should be done for all cases of nPM-SAH, before labeling them as nonaneurysmal SAH. Although the overall outcome for nonaneurysmal spontaneous SAH is better than aneurysmal SAH, nPM-SAH has poorer eventual outcome compared to PM-SAH.

Key concepts: Medicine, Digital subtraction angiography, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, Radiology, Bleed, Angiography, Abnormality, Endovascular treatment

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Yield of Repeat Angiography in Angiography-Negative Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage — Research Paper | ScholarLens