The GreatestAporiain theParmenides(133b-134e) and the Reciprocity ofProsRelations
Uygar Abacı
Abstract
Open-access reader
Uygar Abacı
Abstract
Open-access reader
ABSTRACT The extant attempts in the literature to refute the greatest difficulty argument in theParmenideshave focused on denying the parallelism between theprosrelations among Forms and those among particulars. However, these attempts are unsatisfactory, for the argument can reach its conclusion that we cannot know any Forms without relying on this parallelism. I argue that a more effective strategy is to deny the more essential premise that the knowledge-object relation is aprosrelation. This premise is false becauseprosrelations require definitional and ontological codependence between the relata, and the knowledge-object relation does not satisfy this reciprocity condition.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
ABSTRACT The extant attempts in the literature to refute the greatest difficulty argument in theParmenideshave focused on denying the parallelism between theprosrelations among Forms and those among particulars. However, these attempts are unsatisfactory, for the argument can reach its conclusion that we cannot know any Forms without relying on this parallelism. I argue that a more effective strategy is to deny the more essential premise that the knowledge-object relation is aprosrelation. This premise is false becauseprosrelations require definitional and ontological codependence between the relata, and the knowledge-object relation does not satisfy this reciprocity condition.
Key concepts: Premise, Reciprocity (cultural anthropology), Extant taxon, Relation (database), Argument (complex analysis), Epistemology, Parallelism (grammar), Object (grammar)