2020DialogueOpen access

The GreatestAporiain theParmenides(133b-134e) and the Reciprocity ofProsRelations

Uygar Abacı

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The extant attempts in the literature to refute the greatest difficulty argument in theParmenideshave focused on denying the parallelism between theprosrelations among Forms and those among particulars. However, these attempts are unsatisfactory, for the argument can reach its conclusion that we cannot know any Forms without relying on this parallelism. I argue that a more effective strategy is to deny the more essential premise that the knowledge-object relation is aprosrelation. This premise is false becauseprosrelations require definitional and ontological codependence between the relata, and the knowledge-object relation does not satisfy this reciprocity condition.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT The extant attempts in the literature to refute the greatest difficulty argument in theParmenideshave focused on denying the parallelism between theprosrelations among Forms and those among particulars. However, these attempts are unsatisfactory, for the argument can reach its conclusion that we cannot know any Forms without relying on this parallelism. I argue that a more effective strategy is to deny the more essential premise that the knowledge-object relation is aprosrelation. This premise is false becauseprosrelations require definitional and ontological codependence between the relata, and the knowledge-object relation does not satisfy this reciprocity condition.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT The extant attempts in the literature to refute the greatest difficulty argument in theParmenideshave focused on denying the parallelism between theprosrelations among Forms and those among particulars. However, these attempts are unsatisfactory, for the argument can reach its conclusion that we cannot know any Forms without relying on this parallelism. I argue that a more effective strategy is to deny the more essential premise that the knowledge-object relation is aprosrelation. This premise is false becauseprosrelations require definitional and ontological codependence between the relata, and the knowledge-object relation does not satisfy this reciprocity condition.

Key concepts: Premise, Reciprocity (cultural anthropology), Extant taxon, Relation (database), Argument (complex analysis), Epistemology, Parallelism (grammar), Object (grammar)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The GreatestAporiain theParmenides(133b-134e) and the Reciprocity ofProsRelations — Research Paper | ScholarLens