2020Compensation & Benefits ReviewRequires access

Public Sector Compensation: An Application of Robust and Quantile Regression

Salomon Alcocer Guajardo

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This study assesses whether the theoretical compensation framework used to explain differences in public sector pay among full-time federal and state employees may also explain differences in pay at a local government level. In doing so, this study uses ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to test the application of the theoretical framework to a specific local government. Robust and quantile regression models are used subsequently to validate the findings obtained by the OLS model. The findings reveal that the covariates used to explain differences in compensation among full-time federal and state employees have similar effects at a local governmental level. While the OLS statistical model explains 26% ( R 2 = .26) of the variance, the robust regression model explains 39% ( R 2 = .39) of the variance. The percentage of variation explained by the quantile statistical models ranges from 14% (pseudo- R 2 = .14) to 50% (pseudo- R 2 = .50).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study assesses whether the theoretical compensation framework used to explain differences in public sector pay among full-time federal and state employees may also explain differences in pay at a local government level. In doing so, this study uses ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to test the application of the theoretical framework to a specific local government. Robust and quantile regression models are used subsequently to validate the findings obtained by the OLS model. The findings reveal that the covariates used to explain differences in compensation among full-time federal and state employees have similar effects at a local governmental level. While the OLS statistical model explains 26% ( R 2 = .26) of the variance, the robust regression model explains 39% ( R 2 = .39) of the variance. The percentage of variation explained by the quantile statistical models ranges from 14% (pseudo- R 2 = .14) to 50% (pseudo- R 2 = .50).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study assesses whether the theoretical compensation framework used to explain differences in public sector pay among full-time federal and state employees may also explain differences in pay at a local government level. In doing so, this study uses ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to test the application of the theoretical framework to a specific local government. Robust and quantile regression models are used subsequently to validate the findings obtained by the OLS model. The findings reveal that the covariates used to explain differences in compensation among full-time federal and state employees have similar effects at a local governmental level. While the OLS statistical model explains 26% ( R 2 = .26) of the variance, the robust regression model explains 39% ( R 2 = .39) of the variance. The percentage of variation explained by the quantile statistical models ranges from 14% (pseudo- R 2 = .14) to 50% (pseudo- R 2 = .50).

Key concepts: Ordinary least squares, Quantile regression, Econometrics, Variance (accounting), Covariate, Quantile, Statistics, Regression analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Public Sector Compensation: An Application of Robust and Quantile Regression — Research Paper | ScholarLens