Dynamic Response of Rock Containing Regular Sawteeth Joints under Various Loading Rates and Angles of Application
Peiyun Shu, Chen-Yu Lin, Hung-Hui Li, Ta‐Wui Cheng, T.H. Ueng, Tai‐Tien Wang
Abstract
Peiyun Shu, Chen-Yu Lin, Hung-Hui Li, Ta‐Wui Cheng, T.H. Ueng, Tai‐Tien Wang
Abstract
Intact rock-like specimens and specimens that include a single planar joint or triangular sawteeth joint at various angles are prepared for split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing at loading rates of 303.1–5233.6 GPa/s. Only results that are associated with an error (eε) of less than 20.0% are utilized in subsequent analyses. The effects of the loading rate and angle of the load applied to various joint patterns on the failure type and dynamic peak stresses/strength of the specimens are investigated. Experimental results demonstrate that failure of each specimen can be classified into the following four types, Type A: integrated with or without tiny flake-off, Type B: slide failure, Type C: fracture failure, and Type D: crushing failure. The results of statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicate that the loading rate, the angles of the base plane (β), and the asperity (α) of the sawteeth joint of the specimen all affect its dynamic peak stress when fracture failure occurs. The loading rate and β are important when the slide failure occurs, and the loading rate is the sole factor that significantly influences its dynamic peak stress when the specimen is crushed to failure. The dynamic peak stress of the specimen increases with the loading rate, while the rate of increase gradually decreases. The β and α of a jointed specimen affect the location of stress concentration during loading, further influencing the dynamic peak stress of such a specimen under slide and fracture failure. When the loading rate is high and the specimen is crushed to failure, the influences of β and α disappear, and the increase of loading rate reduces the efficiency of raising the dynamic peak stress.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Intact rock-like specimens and specimens that include a single planar joint or triangular sawteeth joint at various angles are prepared for split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing at loading rates of 303.1–5233.6 GPa/s. Only results that are associated with an error (eε) of less than 20.0% are utilized in subsequent analyses. The effects of the loading rate and angle of the load applied to various joint patterns on the failure type and dynamic peak stresses/strength of the specimens are investigated. Experimental results demonstrate that failure of each specimen can be classified into the following four types, Type A: integrated with or without tiny flake-off, Type B: slide failure, Type C: fracture failure, and Type D: crushing failure. The results of statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicate that the loading rate, the angles of the base plane (β), and the asperity (α) of the sawteeth joint of the specimen all affect its dynamic peak stress when fracture failure occurs. The loading rate and β are important when the slide failure occurs, and the loading rate is the sole factor that significantly influences its dynamic peak stress when the specimen is crushed to failure. The dynamic peak stress of the specimen increases with the loading rate, while the rate of increase gradually decreases. The β and α of a jointed specimen affect the location of stress concentration during loading, further influencing the dynamic peak stress of such a specimen under slide and fracture failure. When the loading rate is high and the specimen is crushed to failure, the influences of β and α disappear, and the increase of loading rate reduces the efficiency of raising the dynamic peak stress.
Key concepts: Materials science, Joint (building), Fracture (geology), Composite material, Dynamic loading, Split-Hopkinson pressure bar, Stress (linguistics), Strain rate