2004•Proceedings of the Water Environment FederationRequires access

LEADERSHIP RESEARCH AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE ACTIVITIES SUCH AS PERFORMANCE AND ASSET MANAGEMENT

Richard L. Gerstberger

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Over 150 utility managers have participated in a leadership development process conducted by TAP Resource Development Group (TAP Resource) between 1998 and 2003. To better understand utility leadership, TAP Resource has studied the results of the leadership assessment portion of the development process. All of the organizations determined that their core Strategic Focus was one of Operational Excellence so the study primarily looked at the leadership style most appropriate for this type of organization. The results of this study present a number of important conclusions, the most significant being the following: 1. A large percentage of utility leaders are not taking a proactive role in the operation of their organization. They apparently cannot or believe they cannot significantly influence the direction or results of their organizations. 2. There is a definite lack of focus on results, on making things happen, on following through in the creation of the vision for the organization. The first pattern may be creating a significant barrier to the development of effective leadership and the second will definitely inhibit the utilities from implementing the vision, the kind of organization that they want and need to create. The answer to this problem, based on this study, is that leaders must begin to proactively influence the direction and results of their organizations! Instead of taking a generic approach to leadership development, programs must be implemented that develop leaders aligned with the needs of the organization. Utilities should implement organizational performance systems designed to institutionalize performance and results within the organization.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Over 150 utility managers have participated in a leadership development process conducted by TAP Resource Development Group (TAP Resource) between 1998 and 2003. To better understand utility leadership, TAP Resource has studied the results of the leadership assessment portion of the development process. All of the organizations determined that their core Strategic Focus was one of Operational Excellence so the study primarily looked at the leadership style most appropriate for this type of organization. The results of this study present a number of important conclusions, the most significant being the following: 1. A large percentage of utility leaders are not taking a proactive role in the operation of their organization. They apparently cannot or believe they cannot significantly influence the direction or results of their organizations. 2. There is a definite lack of focus on results, on making things happen, on following through in the creation of the vision for the organization. The first pattern may be creating a significant barrier to the development of effective leadership and the second will definitely inhibit the utilities from implementing the vision, the kind of organization that they want and need to create. The answer to this problem, based on this study, is that leaders must begin to proactively influence the direction and results of their organizations! Instead of taking a generic approach to leadership development, programs must be implemented that develop leaders aligned with the needs of the organization. Utilities should implement organizational performance systems designed to institutionalize performance and results within the organization.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Over 150 utility managers have participated in a leadership development process conducted by TAP Resource Development Group (TAP Resource) between 1998 and 2003. To better understand utility leadership, TAP Resource has studied the results of the leadership assessment portion of the development process. All of the organizations determined that their core Strategic Focus was one of Operational Excellence so the study primarily looked at the leadership style most appropriate for this type of organization. The results of this study present a number of important conclusions, the most significant being the following: 1. A large percentage of utility leaders are not taking a proactive role in the operation of their organization. They apparently cannot or believe they cannot significantly influence the direction or results of their organizations. 2. There is a definite lack of focus on results, on making things happen, on following through in the creation of the vision for the organization. The first pattern may be creating a significant barrier to the development of effective leadership and the second will definitely inhibit the utilities from implementing the vision, the kind of organization that they want and need to create. The answer to this problem, based on this study, is that leaders must begin to proactively influence the direction and results of their organizations! Instead of taking a generic approach to leadership development, programs must be implemented that develop leaders aligned with the needs of the organization. Utilities should implement organizational performance systems designed to institutionalize performance and results within the organization.

Key concepts: Asset (computer security), Business, Leadership development, Process (computing), Resource (disambiguation), Organizational change, Management, Knowledge management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LEADERSHIP RESEARCH AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE ACTIVITIES SUCH AS PERFORMANCE AND ASSET MANAGEMENT — Research Paper | ScholarLens