2020QJMRequires access

Comparison of Single and Double Chest Tube Drainage Management in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy

AA El-Nori, Hany Elsayed, Ahmed M. Mostafa, Manal Mohamed Kamal

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background chest tube is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in thoracic surgery practice. It is defined as insertion of (chest tube) into the pleural cavity to drain air, blood, bile, pus, chyle or other fluids. Aim of the Work comparison of single and double chest tube drainage management in patients undergoing thoracotomy in the form of pain score, hospital stay, total drainage, residual collection after removal of chest tube and need for another chest tube at Cardiothoracic Academy Hospital and Ain Shams University Specialized Hospital (ASUSH). Patients and Methods this study was conducted on patients who undergone thoracotomy at the Cardiothoracic Academy Hospital and Ain Shams University Specialized Hospital throughout the last 6 months from March 2018 till August 2018. Data was collected retrospectively from 40 patients, 20 patients in each group. In the 20 patients in the ‘single-tube group', only one chest tube was inserted, and in the 20 patients in the ‘double-tube group', two chest tubes were inserted. Pre-, intra- and postoperative variables in both groups were compared. Results 40 patients met all inclusion criteria. The pre- and intraoperative characteristics of the patients were similar in both groups with no significant differences. The single-tube group was found to have a lesser amount of total pleural drainage than the double-tube group but there was no significant difference 202.50 cc vs 297.50 cc, respectively; (p > 0.05). Conclusion our results showed that the single chest tube drainage is more effective, reduces postoperative pain, hospitalization times and duration of drainage in patients who undergo thoracotomy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Background chest tube is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in thoracic surgery practice. It is defined as insertion of (chest tube) into the pleural cavity to drain air, blood, bile, pus, chyle or other fluids. Aim of the Work comparison of single and double chest tube drainage management in patients undergoing thoracotomy in the form of pain score, hospital stay, total drainage, residual collection after removal of chest tube and need for another chest tube at Cardiothoracic Academy Hospital and Ain Shams University Specialized Hospital (ASUSH). Patients and Methods this study was conducted on patients who undergone thoracotomy at the Cardiothoracic Academy Hospital and Ain Shams University Specialized Hospital throughout the last 6 months from March 2018 till August 2018. Data was collected retrospectively from 40 patients, 20 patients in each group. In the 20 patients in the ‘single-tube group', only one chest tube was inserted, and in the 20 patients in the ‘double-tube group', two chest tubes were inserted. Pre-, intra- and postoperative variables in both groups were compared. Results 40 patients met all inclusion criteria. The pre- and intraoperative characteristics of the patients were similar in both groups with no significant differences. The single-tube group was found to have a lesser amount of total pleural drainage than the double-tube group but there was no significant difference 202.50 cc vs 297.50 cc, respectively; (p > 0.05). Conclusion our results showed that the single chest tube drainage is more effective, reduces postoperative pain, hospitalization times and duration of drainage in patients who undergo thoracotomy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Background chest tube is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in thoracic surgery practice. It is defined as insertion of (chest tube) into the pleural cavity to drain air, blood, bile, pus, chyle or other fluids. Aim of the Work comparison of single and double chest tube drainage management in patients undergoing thoracotomy in the form of pain score, hospital stay, total drainage, residual collection after removal of chest tube and need for another chest tube at Cardiothoracic Academy Hospital and Ain Shams University Specialized Hospital (ASUSH). Patients and Methods this study was conducted on patients who undergone thoracotomy at the Cardiothoracic Academy Hospital and Ain Shams University Specialized Hospital throughout the last 6 months from March 2018 till August 2018. Data was collected retrospectively from 40 patients, 20 patients in each group. In the 20 patients in the ‘single-tube group', only one chest tube was inserted, and in the 20 patients in the ‘double-tube group', two chest tubes were inserted. Pre-, intra- and postoperative variables in both groups were compared. Results 40 patients met all inclusion criteria. The pre- and intraoperative characteristics of the patients were similar in both groups with no significant differences. The single-tube group was found to have a lesser amount of total pleural drainage than the double-tube group but there was no significant difference 202.50 cc vs 297.50 cc, respectively; (p > 0.05). Conclusion our results showed that the single chest tube drainage is more effective, reduces postoperative pain, hospitalization times and duration of drainage in patients who undergo thoracotomy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Thoracotomy, Chest tube, Surgery, Cardiothoracic surgery, Pleural cavity, Chest pain, Thoracic cavity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Single and Double Chest Tube Drainage Management in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens