2020Journal of Talent Development and ExcellenceRequires access

Some Problems of Legal Politics of Mediation out of the Court as a Business Dispute Resolution in Indonesia

ST Burhanuddin, Reda Manthovani

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The existence of court mediation in Indonesia is a resolution to overcome the number of cases that do not increase every year. Mediation was governed by Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement and Regulation of the Supreme Court No. 1 of 2016 on Court-Annexed Mediation Procedures. The existence of mediation in Indonesia, however, is not optimal yet, since business disputes can not be effectively resolved. This paper aims at finding and analyzing some issues of legal policy of mediating out-of-court settlement as a business dispute resolution from this condition. This research is a descriptive investigation of Empirical Law. Primary data used in this research come from Supreme Court interviews. The secondary data used includes legal mediation products. The analysis was carried out using methods of qualitative and quantitative analysis with the paradigm of the critical theory. Results of this research show that the legal dispute resolution policy in Indonesia remains weak and needs to be redirected to put mediation at the forefront of efforts to resolve business disputes. Mediation needs to be improved outside the courts; legislators need to set down strict mediation rules.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The existence of court mediation in Indonesia is a resolution to overcome the number of cases that do not increase every year. Mediation was governed by Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement and Regulation of the Supreme Court No. 1 of 2016 on Court-Annexed Mediation Procedures. The existence of mediation in Indonesia, however, is not optimal yet, since business disputes can not be effectively resolved. This paper aims at finding and analyzing some issues of legal policy of mediating out-of-court settlement as a business dispute resolution from this condition. This research is a descriptive investigation of Empirical Law. Primary data used in this research come from Supreme Court interviews. The secondary data used includes legal mediation products. The analysis was carried out using methods of qualitative and quantitative analysis with the paradigm of the critical theory. Results of this research show that the legal dispute resolution policy in Indonesia remains weak and needs to be redirected to put mediation at the forefront of efforts to resolve business disputes. Mediation needs to be improved outside the courts; legislators need to set down strict mediation rules.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The existence of court mediation in Indonesia is a resolution to overcome the number of cases that do not increase every year. Mediation was governed by Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement and Regulation of the Supreme Court No. 1 of 2016 on Court-Annexed Mediation Procedures. The existence of mediation in Indonesia, however, is not optimal yet, since business disputes can not be effectively resolved. This paper aims at finding and analyzing some issues of legal policy of mediating out-of-court settlement as a business dispute resolution from this condition. This research is a descriptive investigation of Empirical Law. Primary data used in this research come from Supreme Court interviews. The secondary data used includes legal mediation products. The analysis was carried out using methods of qualitative and quantitative analysis with the paradigm of the critical theory. Results of this research show that the legal dispute resolution policy in Indonesia remains weak and needs to be redirected to put mediation at the forefront of efforts to resolve business disputes. Mediation needs to be improved outside the courts; legislators need to set down strict mediation rules.

Key concepts: Mediation, Dispute resolution, Arbitration, Alternative dispute resolution, Supreme court, Law, Settlement (finance), Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Some Problems of Legal Politics of Mediation out of the Court as a Business Dispute Resolution in Indonesia — Research Paper | ScholarLens