2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Enemy Combatants: National Security vs. Due Process

W. A. Santmyer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : During the course of the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT), several hundred foreign nationals suspected of terrorism or supporting terrorism have been captured by United States (U.S) forces and their allies. Many of them are being held at the U.S. Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. U.S. Government officials designated these individuals as or unlawful combatants, who are not entitled to the same protections as a prisoner of war under the 1949 Geneva Conventions. The procedures used to determine that these individuals were enemy combatants were subject to numerous legal challenges and subsequently modified by the Bush Administration. However, questions remain as to its constitutionality. Nevertheless, the current modified process already preserves the balance between due process rights and national security interests, and must be protected against future challenges.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : During the course of the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT), several hundred foreign nationals suspected of terrorism or supporting terrorism have been captured by United States (U.S) forces and their allies. Many of them are being held at the U.S. Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. U.S. Government officials designated these individuals as or unlawful combatants, who are not entitled to the same protections as a prisoner of war under the 1949 Geneva Conventions. The procedures used to determine that these individuals were enemy combatants were subject to numerous legal challenges and subsequently modified by the Bush Administration. However, questions remain as to its constitutionality. Nevertheless, the current modified process already preserves the balance between due process rights and national security interests, and must be protected against future challenges.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : During the course of the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT), several hundred foreign nationals suspected of terrorism or supporting terrorism have been captured by United States (U.S) forces and their allies. Many of them are being held at the U.S. Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. U.S. Government officials designated these individuals as or unlawful combatants, who are not entitled to the same protections as a prisoner of war under the 1949 Geneva Conventions. The procedures used to determine that these individuals were enemy combatants were subject to numerous legal challenges and subsequently modified by the Bush Administration. However, questions remain as to its constitutionality. Nevertheless, the current modified process already preserves the balance between due process rights and national security interests, and must be protected against future challenges.

Key concepts: Adversary, Computer security, Process (computing), National security, Computer science, Political science, Business, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Enemy Combatants: National Security vs. Due Process — Research Paper | ScholarLens