2020Lund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University)Requires access

A Study of Discourse and Meaning-Making in Corporate Sustainability Reporting

Xiaohui Yu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The underpinning notion of sustainability and report structure in the current corporate sustainability reporting is normalized by the prevailing adoption of industry frameworks and standards (e.g., the Triple Bottom Line framework and the Global Reporting Initiative Standards). Business sustainability discourse does not only reflect companies’ identities and positions in regard of their engagement with the global sustainability emergency, but also socially constructs the reality of what companies are facing and choose to do. In this thesis, five common elements of business sustainability discourse and the strategies of symbolic construction employed in the latest published sustainability reports from H&M, IKEA, NIKE and RUSTA are identified. The companies’ internal sustainability officers’ meaning-making regarding corporate sustainability and reporting is shown to affect the structuration cycle of corporate sustainability reporting. A narrative is established to connect the elements of business sustainability discourse with the meaning-making of companies’ sustainability officers. Both company organizations and individuals are encouraged to transcend the current ideological lock-in in corporate sustainability and reporting.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The underpinning notion of sustainability and report structure in the current corporate sustainability reporting is normalized by the prevailing adoption of industry frameworks and standards (e.g., the Triple Bottom Line framework and the Global Reporting Initiative Standards). Business sustainability discourse does not only reflect companies’ identities and positions in regard of their engagement with the global sustainability emergency, but also socially constructs the reality of what companies are facing and choose to do. In this thesis, five common elements of business sustainability discourse and the strategies of symbolic construction employed in the latest published sustainability reports from H&M, IKEA, NIKE and RUSTA are identified. The companies’ internal sustainability officers’ meaning-making regarding corporate sustainability and reporting is shown to affect the structuration cycle of corporate sustainability reporting. A narrative is established to connect the elements of business sustainability discourse with the meaning-making of companies’ sustainability officers. Both company organizations and individuals are encouraged to transcend the current ideological lock-in in corporate sustainability and reporting.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The underpinning notion of sustainability and report structure in the current corporate sustainability reporting is normalized by the prevailing adoption of industry frameworks and standards (e.g., the Triple Bottom Line framework and the Global Reporting Initiative Standards). Business sustainability discourse does not only reflect companies’ identities and positions in regard of their engagement with the global sustainability emergency, but also socially constructs the reality of what companies are facing and choose to do. In this thesis, five common elements of business sustainability discourse and the strategies of symbolic construction employed in the latest published sustainability reports from H&M, IKEA, NIKE and RUSTA are identified. The companies’ internal sustainability officers’ meaning-making regarding corporate sustainability and reporting is shown to affect the structuration cycle of corporate sustainability reporting. A narrative is established to connect the elements of business sustainability discourse with the meaning-making of companies’ sustainability officers. Both company organizations and individuals are encouraged to transcend the current ideological lock-in in corporate sustainability and reporting.

Key concepts: Sustainability, Sustainability reporting, Sustainability organizations, Corporate sustainability, Triple bottom line, Social sustainability, Business, Meaning (existential)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Study of Discourse and Meaning-Making in Corporate Sustainability Reporting — Research Paper | ScholarLens