2020Kriminalističke temeOpen access

PREVENTIVE EFFECTS OF PENAL SANCTIONS

Carina Tetal

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Based on sanction and recidivism data alone, it looks like that the probability of recidivism is much higher after a prison sanction then after a fine. This article examines whether this is a result of the criminal sanctions themselves, or whether other factors are involved. To achieve this, data from three offense groups (theft, fraud, burglary) that can be punished with different criminal sanctions (prison, suspended prison sentence, or a fine) are examined. Based on a bivariate combination of criminal sanctions and recidivism, offenders who spend time in prison are more likely to reoffend than offenders who receive a suspended prison sentence or a fine. However, further analysis shows that when a range of other variables are taken considered, the apparent sanctioning effect does not arise from the nature of the criminal sanction, but rather from the offenders’ criminal past. Other factors have a far greater effect on reconviction. In particular, a person’s previous criminal history strongly influences the likelihood of recidivism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Based on sanction and recidivism data alone, it looks like that the probability of recidivism is much higher after a prison sanction then after a fine. This article examines whether this is a result of the criminal sanctions themselves, or whether other factors are involved. To achieve this, data from three offense groups (theft, fraud, burglary) that can be punished with different criminal sanctions (prison, suspended prison sentence, or a fine) are examined. Based on a bivariate combination of criminal sanctions and recidivism, offenders who spend time in prison are more likely to reoffend than offenders who receive a suspended prison sentence or a fine. However, further analysis shows that when a range of other variables are taken considered, the apparent sanctioning effect does not arise from the nature of the criminal sanction, but rather from the offenders’ criminal past. Other factors have a far greater effect on reconviction. In particular, a person’s previous criminal history strongly influences the likelihood of recidivism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Based on sanction and recidivism data alone, it looks like that the probability of recidivism is much higher after a prison sanction then after a fine. This article examines whether this is a result of the criminal sanctions themselves, or whether other factors are involved. To achieve this, data from three offense groups (theft, fraud, burglary) that can be punished with different criminal sanctions (prison, suspended prison sentence, or a fine) are examined. Based on a bivariate combination of criminal sanctions and recidivism, offenders who spend time in prison are more likely to reoffend than offenders who receive a suspended prison sentence or a fine. However, further analysis shows that when a range of other variables are taken considered, the apparent sanctioning effect does not arise from the nature of the criminal sanction, but rather from the offenders’ criminal past. Other factors have a far greater effect on reconviction. In particular, a person’s previous criminal history strongly influences the likelihood of recidivism.

Key concepts: Recidivism, Prison, Sanctions, Criminology, Sentence, Deterrence (psychology), Criminal history, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PREVENTIVE EFFECTS OF PENAL SANCTIONS — Research Paper | ScholarLens